On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:47:14 +0200, Andre Engels wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
>
>> Keep in mind that while a float may have a large apparent precision,
>> there's no promise that the actual value returned by the OS has that
>> much precision. You should be fine if a
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> Keep in mind that while a float may have a large apparent precision,
> there's no promise that the actual value returned by the OS has that much
> precision. You should be fine if all you're looking for is ms, but I
> wouldn't count on much more
In article
<9c600f0c-f4a0-4e8c-bbb9-27f128aec...@m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
"scriptlear...@gmail.com" wrote:
> I am trying to measure some system response time by using the time.time
> () or time.clock() in my script. However, the numbers I get are in
> 10s of milliseconds.
> [...]
> The tr
I am trying to measure some system response time by using the time.time
() or time.clock() in my script. However, the numbers I get are in
10s of milliseconds.
For example,
1248481670.34 #from time.time()
0.08 #from time.clock()
That won't work for me, since the response time
