John Salerno wrote:
> Pardon my naivety, you would think maybe I'd understand this by now, but
> I've always kind of wondered about it. I've been curious why one of the
> biggest points used to promote Python is that it has "batteries
> included." True, this is a great feature, but the way it's bee
John Salerno napisał(a):
> So my question is, what is the difference between Python's 'batteries'
> (standard modules), and C#'s framework? I know nothing of Java, but I
> assume it has its own rich (and confusing) set of classes as well. Is
> there something different about other languages' libra
John Salerno wrote:
> Pardon my naivety, you would think maybe I'd understand this by now, but
> I've always kind of wondered about it. I've been curious why one of the
> biggest points used to promote Python is that it has "batteries
> included." True, this is a great feature, but the way it's bee
Pardon my naivety, you would think maybe I'd understand this by now, but
I've always kind of wondered about it. I've been curious why one of the
biggest points used to promote Python is that it has "batteries
included." True, this is a great feature, but the way it's been used
seems to suggest
