En Mon, 12 Feb 2007 07:44:14 -0300, Duncan Booth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in triplicate:
>
>> If I were paid for the number of lines *written* that would not be a
>> great deal :)
>
> You don't by any chance get paid by the number of posts to
On Feb 12, 11:44 pm, Deniz Dogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Duncan Booth wrote:
> > "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in triplicate:
>
> >> If I were paid for the number of lines *written* that would not be a
> >> great deal :)
>
> > You don't by any chance get paid by the number of
Duncan Booth wrote:
> "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in triplicate:
>
>> If I were paid for the number of lines *written* that would not be a
>> great deal :)
>
> You don't by any chance get paid by the number of posts to c.l.python?
I was thinking the same thing.
--
http://mail
"Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in triplicate:
> If I were paid for the number of lines *written* that would not be a
> great deal :)
You don't by any chance get paid by the number of posts to c.l.python?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 03:01:55 -0300, Gabriel Genellina wrote:
> En Mon, 12 Feb 2007 02:38:29 -0300, Samuel Karl Peterson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> Sorry to steal the thread! This is only related to your signature:
>
>> "if programmers were paid to remove code instead of adding it,
>>
En Mon, 12 Feb 2007 02:38:29 -0300, Samuel Karl Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
Sorry to steal the thread! This is only related to your signature:
> "if programmers were paid to remove code instead of adding it,
> software would be much better" -- unknown
I just did that last week. Arou
Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:23:59
-0700 didst step forth and proclaim thus:
> Samuel Karl Peterson wrote:
> > Greetings Pythonistas. I have recently discovered a strange anomoly
> > with string.replace. It seemingly, randomly does not deal with
> > characters of ord
Samuel Karl Peterson wrote:
> Greetings Pythonistas. I have recently discovered a strange anomoly
> with string.replace. It seemingly, randomly does not deal with
> characters of ordinal value > 127. I ran into this problem while
> downloading auction web pages from ebay and trying to replace th
Greetings Pythonistas. I have recently discovered a strange anomoly
with string.replace. It seemingly, randomly does not deal with
characters of ordinal value > 127. I ran into this problem while
downloading auction web pages from ebay and trying to replace the
"\xa0" (dec 160, nbsp char in iso-
