On Thursday, November 24, 2005 at 8:06:34 PM UTC+5:30, bon...@gmail.com wrote:
> Bengt Richter wrote:
> > Depends on what you run ;-) Maybe how many times buggy apps die in unusual
> > ways.
> > Or worse, buggy drivers. Your car might have bad 4-wheel drive that you
> > never used,
> > so you tho
Bengt Richter wrote:
> Depends on what you run ;-) Maybe how many times buggy apps die in unusual
> ways.
> Or worse, buggy drivers. Your car might have bad 4-wheel drive that you never
> used,
> so you thought your car reliable ;-)
>
Sure, no casual toys are allowed. But this is true in general
On 24 Nov 2005 03:22:26 -0800, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>> If windows has been running a long time (a few days or a week may be long
>> ;-) it
>> may get fragmented in some smallish memory arena reserved for special things
>> (I forgot
>> what versio
Bengt Richter wrote:
> If windows has been running a long time (a few days or a week may be long ;-)
> it
> may get fragmented in some smallish memory arena reserved for special things
> (I forgot
> what versions, but I wouldn't be surprised if something still had s
> specialized limit).
>
I kn
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:18:34 +0100, "Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
>> > print data
>> >>
>> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> >> File "xxx", line xxx, in ?
>> >>print data
>> >> IOError: [Errno 12] Not enough space
>> >
>> >errno 12 is ENOMEM (t
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:24:02 +0100, "Fredrik Lundh"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
>> I have added a question mark...
>>
>> However: did you have installed SP1 or SP2?
>
>running XP without service packs is a really bad idea. you're not
>telling me that you haven't updated, a
Manlio Perillo wrote:
> I have added a question mark...
>
> However: did you have installed SP1 or SP2?
running XP without service packs is a really bad idea. you're not
telling me that you haven't updated, are you?
(the machines I tested on are all fully up to date)
--
http://mail.python
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 05:22:18 GMT, Dennis Lee Bieber
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:51:15 GMT, Manlio Perillo
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> declaimed the following in
>comp.lang.python:
>
>> So, it's seem to be a specific problem of Windows XP(?).
>>
> Pardon? I think the prior res
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:21:45 +0100, "Fredrik Lundh"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
>> So, it's seem to be a specific problem of Windows XP(?).
>>
>> Nobody can test it on a Windows 98/2000 machine?
>
>works fine on assorted XP and 2000 boxes for me.
>
That's very strange.
>i
Manlio Perillo wrote:
> So, it's seem to be a specific problem of Windows XP(?).
>
> Nobody can test it on a Windows 98/2000 machine?
works fine on assorted XP and 2000 boxes for me.
is the "n = 61409 + 1" stuff necessary, or do you get the same
problem for all outputs over a given size ? even
Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on
win32
No problems on Windows 2000 Pro with 512MB of RAM
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2005-11-23, Manlio Perillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 07:48:30 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>That code works here.
>>
>>Python2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32
>>
>>It's Windows XP, Pentium 4, unknown amount of RAM. I'm running pyt
Manlio Perillo wrote:
> > print data
> >>
> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >> File "xxx", line xxx, in ?
> >>print data
> >> IOError: [Errno 12] Not enough space
> >
> >errno 12 is ENOMEM (that is, the system did not have enough memory
> >to finish an operation).
>
> However I th
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 07:48:30 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>That code works here.
>
>Python2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32
>
>It's Windows XP, Pentium 4, unknown amount of RAM. I'm running python.exe in a
>console window. It also worked in IDLE.
>
>Jeff
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:59:45 +0100, "Fredrik Lundh"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
>> Python 2.4.1 (#65, Mar 30 2005, 09:13:57) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)]
>> on win32, Windows XP
>>
>> I have this problem:
>>
> n = 61409 + 1
> data = 'x' * n
>>
> print data
>>
>>
Manlio Perillo wrote:
> Python 2.4.1 (#65, Mar 30 2005, 09:13:57) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)]
> on win32, Windows XP
>
> I have this problem:
>
n = 61409 + 1
data = 'x' * n
>
print data
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "xxx", line xxx, in ?
>print data
> IOError: [
That code works here.
Python2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32
It's Windows XP, Pentium 4, unknown amount of RAM. I'm running python.exe in a
console window. It also worked in IDLE.
Jeff
pgptwrbVpG8CR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
http://mail.python.or
Manlio Perillo wrote:
> Regards.
>
> On my system:
> Python 2.4.1 (#65, Mar 30 2005, 09:13:57) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)]
> on win32, Windows XP
>
> I have this problem:
>
>
n = 61409 + 1
data = 'x' * n
>
>
print data
>
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "xxx", lin
Regards.
On my system:
Python 2.4.1 (#65, Mar 30 2005, 09:13:57) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)]
on win32, Windows XP
I have this problem:
>>> n = 61409 + 1
>>> data = 'x' * n
>>> print data
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "xxx", line xxx, in ?
print data
IOError: [Errno 12] Not enou
19 matches
Mail list logo