Ivan Voras wrote:
> Peter Hansen wrote:
>
>> call to recv() does not guarantee that the full 608 bytes of data is
>
> Does read() have that guarantee?
Assuming you mean read() on the file object that would be returned by
calling makefile() on the socket, then the docs imply that this is the
c
Peter Hansen wrote:
> call to recv() does not guarantee that the full 608 bytes of data is
Does read() have that guarantee?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Zunbeltz Izaola wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2005 09:10:13 -0400, Peter Hansen wrote:
>>How did you intend to stop the thread in a manner which might be unsafe?
>>(Hint, unless you're doing something unusual, you can't.)
>
> I have a threaded object (Mythread). It checks if want_thread
> variable is Tr
On Fri, 13 May 2005 16:47:34 +0200, Zunbeltz Izaola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 13 May 2005 09:10:13 -0400, Peter Hansen wrote:
>
>>
>> How did you intend to stop the thread in a manner which might be unsafe?
>> (Hint, unless you're doing something unusual, you can't.)
>>
>
>I have a thread
On Fri, 13 May 2005 09:10:13 -0400, Peter Hansen wrote:
>
> How did you intend to stop the thread in a manner which might be unsafe?
> (Hint, unless you're doing something unusual, you can't.)
>
I have a threaded object (Mythread). It checks if want_thread
variable is True to return. The proble
Zunbeltz Izaola wrote:
> I have a wxPython application that call makes a thread (with threading
> module). In some moment i've to stop the thread but i need to finish a
> funtion in the thread before it can stop. How can i achive this?
How did you intend to stop the thread in a manner which might
Hi,
I have a wxPython application that call makes a thread (with threading
module). In some moment i've to stop the thread but i need to finish a
funtion in the thread before it can stop. How can i achive this?
Thanks in advance
Zunbletz
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list