On Mar 31, 1:09 pm, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> On Mar 30, 4:25 pm, s...@sig.for.address (Victor Eijkhout) wrote:
>
> > I have two arrays, made with numpy. The first one has values that I want
> > to use as sorting keys; the second one needs to be sorted by those keys.
> > Obviously I could turn th
On Mar 30, 4:25 pm, s...@sig.for.address (Victor Eijkhout) wrote:
> I have two arrays, made with numpy. The first one has values that I want
> to use as sorting keys; the second one needs to be sorted by those keys.
> Obviously I could turn them into a dictionary of pairs and sort by the
> first m
Victor Eijkhout wrote:
> Robert Kern wrote:
>
>> second[first.argsort()]
>
> Really cool. Thanks.
>
>> Ask numpy questions on the numpy mailing list.
>
> I will. I thought that this question would have an answer in a generic
> python idiom.
>
> Victor.
Not an unreasonable assumption, but it
On 2010-03-31 13:58 PM, Victor Eijkhout wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
second[first.argsort()]
Really cool. Thanks.
Ask numpy questions on the numpy mailing list.
I will. I thought that this question would have an answer in a generic
python idiom.
When dealing with numpy arrays, the generic
Robert Kern wrote:
> second[first.argsort()]
Really cool. Thanks.
> Ask numpy questions on the numpy mailing list.
I will. I thought that this question would have an answer in a generic
python idiom.
Victor.
--
Victor Eijkhout -- eijkhout at tacc utexas edu
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
On 2010-03-30 18:25 , Victor Eijkhout wrote:
I have two arrays, made with numpy. The first one has values that I want
to use as sorting keys; the second one needs to be sorted by those keys.
Obviously I could turn them into a dictionary of pairs and sort by the
first member, but I think that's n
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Chris Colbert wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Victor Eijkhout wrote:
>
>> I have two arrays, made with numpy. The first one has values that I want
>> to use as sorting keys; the second one needs to be sorted by those keys.
>> Obviously I could turn t
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Victor Eijkhout wrote:
> I have two arrays, made with numpy. The first one has values that I want
> to use as sorting keys; the second one needs to be sorted by those keys.
> Obviously I could turn them into a dictionary of pairs and sort by the
> first member, bu
Victor Eijkhout wrote:
I have two arrays, made with numpy. The first one has values that I want
to use as sorting keys; the second one needs to be sorted by those keys.
Obviously I could turn them into a dictionary of pairs and sort by the
first member, but I think that's not very efficient, at
Victor Eijkhout wrote:
> I have two arrays, made with numpy. The first one has values that I want
> to use as sorting keys; the second one needs to be sorted by those keys.
> Obviously I could turn them into a dictionary of pairs and sort by the
> first member, but I think that's not very efficien
* Victor Eijkhout:
I have two arrays, made with numpy. The first one has values that I want
to use as sorting keys; the second one needs to be sorted by those keys.
Obviously I could turn them into a dictionary of pairs and sort by the
first member, but I think that's not very efficient, at leas
I have two arrays, made with numpy. The first one has values that I want
to use as sorting keys; the second one needs to be sorted by those keys.
Obviously I could turn them into a dictionary of pairs and sort by the
first member, but I think that's not very efficient, at least in space,
and this
12 matches
Mail list logo
