On 2011-11-28 14:14, rusi wrote:
On Nov 28, 4:42 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
We don't chase people down on the street and lecture them about the
problems we think they are having, we answer questions about ACTUAL
problems that they have experienced and asking about.
... ever question gets
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:14:27 -0800, rusi wrote:
> On Nov 28, 4:42 pm, Steven D'Aprano +comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
>> We don't chase people down on the street and lecture them about the
>> problems we think they are having, we answer questions about ACTUAL
>> problems that they have ex
On Nov 28, 4:42 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> We don't chase people down on the street and lecture them about the
> problems we think they are having, we answer questions about ACTUAL
> problems that they have experienced and asking about.
> ... ever question gets an answer, and we're discussing
>
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 23:18:15 -0800, rusi wrote:
> On Nov 28, 9:37 am, alex23 wrote:
>
>> With that approach in mind, I've never had any real issues using pip,
>> virtualenv etc for managing my development environment.
>
> Yes that is in a way my point also: we discuss (things like) pip,
> virtu
On Nov 28, 9:37 am, alex23 wrote:
> With that approach in mind, I've never had any real issues using pip,
> virtualenv etc for managing my development environment.
Yes that is in a way my point also: we discuss (things like) pip,
virtualenv etc too little.
Try working out the ratio of the numbe
rusi wrote:
> While Ive never seen anything as ridiculous as the debian-rails in the
> python world, its still always a hobson choice: use a deb package
> that will cleanly install, deinstall, upgrade etc but is out of date
> or use a fresh and shiny egg that messes up the system.
The only time
In article
<46c11371-411a-4ba0-89b9-967e2f83e...@k5g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
rusi wrote:
> If the linguistic features were all that mattered Lisp would be the
> king of languages today
(that (is (one (of (the (most (absurd (statements (I've (read (in (a
(long (time))
--
http://
On Nov 28, 2:46 am, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 27Nov2011 23:54, Matt Joiner wrote:
> | Agreed. I recently gave Haskell a go, and it was remarkable how
> | similar the package management is to Python's.
> |
> | How well does the new "packaging" (set for release in Python 3.3?)
> | module deal wit
On 27Nov2011 23:54, Matt Joiner wrote:
| Agreed. I recently gave Haskell a go, and it was remarkable how
| similar the package management is to Python's.
|
| How well does the new "packaging" (set for release in Python 3.3?)
| module deal with the problems?
|
| With a better package management s
Agreed. I recently gave Haskell a go, and it was remarkable how
similar the package management is to Python's.
How well does the new "packaging" (set for release in Python 3.3?)
module deal with the problems?
With a better package management system, the half of the standard
library that nobody us
On Nov 26, 11:28 am, rusi wrote:
> On Nov 26, 6:40 pm, kj wrote:
> The only thing I disagree about is that GvR is 'top' enough to handle
> this.
For a concrete example of how uninterested Mr. Van Rossum has become,
take a look at the gawd awful state of Tkinter and especially IDLE.
Whist I appla
On Nov 26, 6:40 pm, kj wrote:
> it's an all-out disgrace.
>
> when is python going to get a decent module distribution system???
>
> and don't tell me to do it myself: it's clear that the sorry
> situation we have now is precisely that too many programmers without
> the requisite expertise or poli
On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 14:22 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > when is python going to get a decent module distribution system???
>
> Python 4.3, scheduled for March 2038. It's been ready for a few years
> now, and a small secret coterie of privileged developers have been
> using
> it for their o
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:40:28 +, kj wrote:
> it's an all-out disgrace.
>
> when is python going to get a decent module distribution system???
Python 4.3, scheduled for March 2038. It's been ready for a few years
now, and a small secret coterie of privileged developers have been using
it for
it's an all-out disgrace.
when is python going to get a decent module distribution system???
and don't tell me to do it myself: it's clear that the sorry
situation we have now is precisely that too many programmers without
the requisite expertise or policy-making authority have decided to
pitch
15 matches
Mail list logo
