Hans Georg Krauthaeuser schrieb:
> Hans Georg Krauthaeuser schrieb:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was playing with scipy.stats.itemfreq when I observed the following
>> overflow:
>>
>> In [119]:for i in [254,255,256,257,258]:
>>.:l=[0]*i
>>.:print i, stats.itemfreq(l), l.count(0)
>
Hans Georg Krauthaeuser schrieb:
> Hi All,
>
> I was playing with scipy.stats.itemfreq when I observed the following
> overflow:
>
> In [119]:for i in [254,255,256,257,258]:
>.:l=[0]*i
>.:print i, stats.itemfreq(l), l.count(0)
>.:
> 254 [ [ 0 254]] 254
> 255 [ [
Hi All,
I was playing with scipy.stats.itemfreq when I observed the following
overflow:
In [119]:for i in [254,255,256,257,258]:
.:l=[0]*i
.:print i, stats.itemfreq(l), l.count(0)
.:
254 [ [ 0 254]] 254
255 [ [ 0 255]] 255
256 [ [0 0]] 256
257 [ [0 1]] 257
258 [