En Sat, 03 Feb 2007 18:07:12 -0300, Jacol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> I understand that author generated exception and than extracted the name
> of
> function from the exeption. But is any sens in using exeptions service if
> we have smthing simpler: just print for example? In my opinion n
Jacol a écrit :
> I understand that author generated exception and than extracted the name of
> function from the exeption. But is any sens in using exeptions service if
> we have smthing simpler: just print for example? In my opinion no, it
> doesn't make sens.
You're of course right. Exceptions
Jacol wrote:
> I understand that author generated exception and than extracted the name of
> function from the exeption. But is any sens in using exeptions service if
> we have smthing simpler: just print for example? In my opinion no, it
> doesn't make sens.
You are correct. The author of that co
On Feb 3, 9:07 pm, Jacol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that author generated exception and than extracted the name of
> function from the exeption. But is any sens in using exeptions service if
> we have smthing simpler: just print for example? In my opinion no, it
> doesn't make sens.
I understand that author generated exception and than extracted the name of
function from the exeption. But is any sens in using exeptions service if
we have smthing simpler: just print for example? In my opinion no, it
doesn't make sens.
Jacek
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-li
Hello everybody!
I found this:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/1999-July/006344.html
My question concernings "callerFunc" and is more general what is difference
between:
try:
raise "xyz"
except "xyz":
print "This is smthing"
and simpl
