Re: question about including something like sqlite in python

2006-09-14 Thread Aahz
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Salerno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I was just thinking, since Python 3.0 is supposed to clean up a lot of >the unnecessary or redundant features of Python and make other things >more streamlined, does it seem to anyone that including SQLite goes >against

Re: question about including something like sqlite in python

2006-09-14 Thread Magnus Lycka
John Salerno wrote: > I was just thinking, since Python 3.0 is supposed to clean up a lot of > the unnecessary or redundant features of Python and make other things > more streamlined, does it seem to anyone that including SQLite goes > against this goal? Not to me. I don't see the redundancy.

Re: question about including something like sqlite in python

2006-09-12 Thread Frank Millman
John Salerno wrote: > I was just thinking, since Python 3.0 is supposed to clean up a lot of > the unnecessary or redundant features of Python and make other things > more streamlined, does it seem to anyone that including SQLite goes > against this goal? > > This is just me thinking out loud, min

Re: question about including something like sqlite in python

2006-09-12 Thread skip
John> I guess I am just trying to figure out why I'm a little surprised John> sqlite was included, but at the same time I'm excited to use it John> and the fact that it will now be standard has caused me to look John> into more than otherwise. :) You might find some of the discuss

Re: question about including something like sqlite in python

2006-09-12 Thread John Salerno
Dan Sommers wrote: > It's difficult to imagine > any one developer (or development shop) using the entire library, so at > least one module must be extraneous. That's a good point. I guess I am just trying to figure out why I'm a little surprised sqlite was included, but at the same time I'm exc

Re: question about including something like sqlite in python

2006-09-11 Thread Ben Finney
John Salerno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was just thinking, since Python 3.0 is supposed to clean up a lot > of the unnecessary or redundant features of Python and make other > things more streamlined, does it seem to anyone that including > SQLite goes against this goal? To my mind, "unneces

Re: question about including something like sqlite in python

2006-09-11 Thread Sashmit Bhaduri
John Salerno wrote: > This is just me thinking out loud, mind you, but it seems like including > a database module (especially one that many people won't use in favor > of MySQL or PostgreSQL, etc.) is weighing down the standard library. Weighing down the standard library? The latest version of

question about including something like sqlite in python

2006-09-11 Thread John Salerno
I was just thinking, since Python 3.0 is supposed to clean up a lot of the unnecessary or redundant features of Python and make other things more streamlined, does it seem to anyone that including SQLite goes against this goal? This is just me thinking out loud, mind you, but it seems like incl