>> This is a related question.
>>
>> I perform an octal dump on a file:
>> $ od -cx file
>> 000 h e l l o w o r l d \n
>> 6568 6c6c 206f 6f77 6c72 0a64
>>
>> I want to output the names of those characters:
>> $ python3
>> Python 3.2.3 (default,
On 16/06/2012 00:42, Jason Friedman wrote:
This is a related question.
I perform an octal dump on a file:
$ od -cx file
000 h e l l o w o r l d \n
65686c6c206f6f776c720a64
I want to output the names of those characters:
$ python3
Pyth
This is a related question.
I perform an octal dump on a file:
$ od -cx file
000 h e l l o w o r l d \n
65686c6c206f6f776c720a64
I want to output the names of those characters:
$ python3
Python 3.2.3 (default, May 19 2012, 17:01:30)
[GCC
On 05/31/2012 03:10 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:28 AM, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> ... a lexer module that is structured as many
>> dozens of little functions, each with a docstring that is
>> a regex string.
>
> This may be a good opportunity to take a step back and ask you
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:28 AM, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
> ... a lexer module that is structured as many
> dozens of little functions, each with a docstring that is
> a regex string.
This may be a good opportunity to take a step back and ask yourself:
Why so many functions, each with a regular expr
On 05/30/2012 09:07 AM, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 05:54 AM, Thomas Rachel wrote:
>> Am 30.05.2012 08:52 schrieb ru...@yahoo.com:
>>
>>> This breaks a lot of my code because in python 2
>>>re.split (ur'[\u3000]', u'A\u3000A') ==> [u'A', u'A']
>>> but in python 3 (the result of
On 30 mai, 08:52, "ru...@yahoo.com" wrote:
> In python2, "\u" escapes are processed in raw unicode
> strings. That is, ur'\u3000' is a string of length 1
> consisting of the IDEOGRAPHIC SPACE unicode character.
>
> In python3, "\u" escapes are not processed in raw strings.
> r'\u3000' is a string
On 30 mai, 13:54, Thomas Rachel wrote:
> Am 30.05.2012 08:52 schrieb ru...@yahoo.com:
>
>
>
> > This breaks a lot of my code because in python 2
> > re.split (ur'[\u3000]', u'A\u3000A') ==> [u'A', u'A']
> > but in python 3 (the result of running 2to3),
> > re.split (r'[\u3000]', 'A\
On 05/30/2012 10:46 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/30/2012 2:52 AM, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> In python2, "\u" escapes are processed in raw unicode
>> strings. That is, ur'\u3000' is a string of length 1
>> consisting of the IDEOGRAPHIC SPACE unicode character.
>
> That surprised me until I rechec
On 30.05.12 14:54, Thomas Rachel wrote:
There is a 3rd one: use r'[ ' + '\u3000' + ']'. Not very nice to read,
but should do the trick...
Or r'[ %s]' % ('\u3000',).
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 5/30/2012 2:52 AM, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
In python2, "\u" escapes are processed in raw unicode
strings. That is, ur'\u3000' is a string of length 1
consisting of the IDEOGRAPHIC SPACE unicode character.
That surprised me until I rechecked the fine manual and found:
"When an 'r' or 'R' pre
On 05/30/2012 05:54 AM, Thomas Rachel wrote:
> Am 30.05.2012 08:52 schrieb ru...@yahoo.com:
>
>> This breaks a lot of my code because in python 2
>>re.split (ur'[\u3000]', u'A\u3000A') ==> [u'A', u'A']
>> but in python 3 (the result of running 2to3),
>>re.split (r'[\u3000]', 'A\u30
On 30 May 2012 12:54, Thomas Rachel
wrote:
> There is a 3rd one: use r'[ ' + '\u3000' + ']'. Not very nice to read, but
> should do the trick...
You could even take advantage of string literal concatenation:)
r'[' '\u3000' r']'
--
Arnaud
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:52 AM, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Was there a reason for dropping the lexical processing of
> \u escapes in strings in python3 (other than to add another
> annoyance in a long list of python3 annoyances?)
>
> And is there no choice for me but to choose between the two
> poo
Am 30.05.2012 08:52 schrieb ru...@yahoo.com:
This breaks a lot of my code because in python 2
re.split (ur'[\u3000]', u'A\u3000A') ==> [u'A', u'A']
but in python 3 (the result of running 2to3),
re.split (r'[\u3000]', 'A\u3000A' ) ==> ['A\u3000A']
I can remove the "r" prefix from
On 5/30/2012 1:52 AM, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Was there a reason for dropping the lexical processing of
> \u escapes in strings in python3 (other than to add another
> annoyance in a long list of python3 annoyances?)
To me, this would be a Python 2 annoyance since I would expect r'\u3000'
to be li
In python2, "\u" escapes are processed in raw unicode
strings. That is, ur'\u3000' is a string of length 1
consisting of the IDEOGRAPHIC SPACE unicode character.
In python3, "\u" escapes are not processed in raw strings.
r'\u3000' is a string of length 6 consisting of a backslash,
'u', '3' and th
17 matches
Mail list logo
