> On 6 Aug 2024, at 07:11, aotto1968 via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> I know but I use a thread like a process because the "conversation" between
> the threads is done by my
> software. a Thread is usually faster to startup (thread-pool) this mean for
> high-load this is
> significant faster ev
On 06.08.24 04:34, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2024-08-05, aotto1968 via Python-list wrote:
Is it possible to run two completely independent Python interpreters
in one process, each using a thread?
By independent, I mean that no data is shared between the
interpreters and thus the C API can be us
On 06.08.24 02:32, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 23:19:14 +0200, aotto1968 wrote:
Is it possible to run two completely independent Python interpreters in
one process, each using a thread?
By independent, I mean that no data is shared between the interpreters
and thus the C API
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 08:48, aotto1968 via Python-list
wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> Is it possible to run two completely independent Python interpreters in one
> process, each using a thread?
>
> By independent, I mean that no data is shared between the interpreters and
> thus the C API can be used withou
On 2024-08-05, aotto1968 via Python-list wrote:
> Is it possible to run two completely independent Python interpreters
> in one process, each using a thread?
>
> By independent, I mean that no data is shared between the
> interpreters and thus the C API can be used without any other
> "lock/GIL"
hi,
Is it possible to run two completely independent Python interpreters in one
process, each using a thread?
By independent, I mean that no data is shared between the interpreters and thus the C API can be used without any other
"lock/GIL" etc.
mfg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf
