On May 18, 11:02 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/18/2011 5:24 AM, lkcl wrote:
>
> There seem to be two somewhat separate requirement issues: the
> interpreter binary and the language version.
yes. [with the startling possibility of compiling the entire pyjs
compiler into javascript and executing
On 5/18/2011 9:42 AM, lkcl wrote:
he's got a good point, terry. breaking backwards-compatibility was a
completely mad and incomprehensible decision.
I see that I should take everything you (or Harris) say with a big grain
of salt;-). You just gave me a lecture about the impossibility of do
On 5/18/2011 5:24 AM, lkcl wrote:
There seem to be two somewhat separate requirement issues: the
interpreter binary and the language version.
a) at the moment a http://python.org 2.N interpreter is required to
actually run the translator. if you use http://python.org 2.5 or 2.6
you do not
On May 17, 5:38 pm, harrismh777 wrote:
> is recompiled everything still works... not so in Python. The fact that
> Python is free to morph gleely from PEP to PEP without responsibility or
> accountability with the user base is what may kill Python, unless the
> Python community gets a grip on thi
On May 18, 10:24 am, lkcl wrote:
> > > otherwise please - really: just saying "give me support for python
> > > 3.x or else" is ...
>
> > And I did not say that.
>
> yeah i know - i'm sorry: it just, with a little bit of "twisting",
> could be construed as implying that.
in case it wasn't cl
On May 18, 6:29 am, harrismh777 wrote:
> Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> > No, because I think you are exaggerating. That said, I think core
> > Python is pretty close to 'complete' and I would not mind further syntax
> > freezes like the one for 3.2.
>
> I am exaggerating only to the extent that someone
On May 18, 2:33 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/17/2011 12:07 PM, lkcl wrote:
>
> > On May 4, 7:37 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> >> On 5/4/2011 10:06 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> >>> pyjamasis a suite of projects, including a python-to-javascript
> >>> compiler
> >> As you well know, there
harrismh777 wrote:
> If there is another major jump like 2.x --> 3.x in the future, Python
> will die. I hope you guys are aware of this. The user base might accept
> this thing once, but they're not going do it again...
The differences between major version releases of Python are far, far
less
Terry Reedy wrote:
No, because I think you are exaggerating. That said, I think core
Python is pretty close to 'complete' and I would not mind further syntax
freezes like the one for 3.2.
I am exaggerating only to the extent that someone can imagine folks
becoming just annoyed with PEP progr
On 5/17/2011 12:38 PM, harrismh777 wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
Like it or not, Python 3 is the future of Python. It is the Python that
many Python newcomers learn first, and perhaps ever will.
Yes, no doubt, and I'm genuine about that...
... but there is something else to consider, as I'm sure
On 5/17/2011 12:07 PM, lkcl wrote:
On May 4, 7:37 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/4/2011 10:06 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
pyjamasis a suite of projects, including a python-to-javascript
compiler
As you well know, there is no such thing as 'python' when it comes to
compiling actual
Terry Reedy wrote:
Like it or not, Python 3 is the future of Python. It is the Python that
many Python newcomers learn first, and perhaps ever will.
Yes, no doubt, and I'm genuine about that...
... but there is something else to consider, as I'm sure you are aware.
At some point Python is goi
On May 4, 7:37 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/4/2011 10:06 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> > after a long delay thepyjamasproject -http://pyjs.org- has begun the
> > 0.8 series of releases, beginning with alpha1:
>
> >https://sourceforge.net/projects/pyjamas/files/pyjamas/0.8/
>
> >pyja
On 5/4/2011 10:06 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
after a long delay the pyjamas project - http://pyjs.org - has begun the
0.8 series of releases, beginning with alpha1:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/pyjamas/files/pyjamas/0.8/
pyjamas is a suite of projects, including a python-to-jav
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> after a long delay the pyjamas project - http://pyjs.org - has begun the
> 0.8 series of releases, beginning with alpha1:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/pyjamas/files/pyjamas/0.8/
>
> pyjamas is a suite of projects, inclu
after a long delay the pyjamas project - http://pyjs.org - has begun the
0.8 series of releases, beginning with alpha1:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/pyjamas/files/pyjamas/0.8/
pyjamas is a suite of projects, including a python-to-javascript
compiler with two modes of operation (roughly classi
16 matches
Mail list logo
