On Wednesday 22 March 2006 02:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Of TurboGers & Django WAF candidates, which one would be easier to use
> in an environment where the data/content doesn't come an RDBMS, but
> from other server-side apps... If these are not good candidates, could
> you sugg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Of TurboGers & Django WAF candidates, which one would be easier to use
> in an environment where the data/content doesn't come an RDBMS, but
> from other server-side apps...
IMHO, both.
> If these are not good candidates, could
> you suggest appropriate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Of TurboGers & Django WAF candidates, which one would be easier to use
> in an environment where the data/content doesn't come an RDBMS, but
> from other server-side apps...
Django is trivial to use for this (but you still want to use a DB together
with the built-in adm
Try web.py. Very simple and powerful web framework.
http://webpy.org
-anand
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> If you don't want to use RDBMS, I think Karrigell is better. Many
> features of Django and TurboGears relate to database.
I've just begun looking at it, but I've also been impressed with Myghty.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 21 Mar 2006 17:06:12 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Of TurboGers & Django WAF candidates, which one would be easier to use
> in an environment where the data/content doesn't come an RDBMS, but
> from other server-side apps... If these are not good candidates,
Hi folks,
Of TurboGers & Django WAF candidates, which one would be easier to use
in an environment where the data/content doesn't come an RDBMS, but
from other server-side apps... If these are not good candidates, could
you suggest appropriate ones...
TIA,
/venkat
--
http://mail.python.org/mail
