[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
⢠many says i'm posting off topic posts. In recent years they start to
say i'm posting tangentially relevant posts. That's not correct. In
fact, there are huge number of blatantly off-topics posts by regulars
that spawn off from threads, happens regularly. The topics va
over the past 5 years there are some negative remarks on me or my
posts. I have almost never responded to any of them. Here i want to
clarify a few things.
⢠I seldomly write off-topic posts. For example, any argument about
netiquette, i consider off-topic, including defense such as what i'm
doi
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2008-07-22, szr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> J?rgen Exner wrote:
>>> Chris Rathman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
I can't say that I see any particular point to the essay.
>>>
>>> You must be new here. There never is any particular point to
>>> Xah Lee's rantings exc
On 2008-07-22, szr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J?rgen Exner wrote:
>> Chris Rathman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I can't say that I see any particular point to the essay.
>>
>> You must be new here. There never is any particular point to
>> Xah Lee's rantings except to cross-post borderline t
On Jul 18, 1:17 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today, i took sometime to list some major or talked-about langs that
> arose in recent years.
You missed PowerShell and ActionScript.
Languages are just tools. It may have escaped your notice, but it's a
remarkable fact that no
Jürgen Exner wrote:
> Chris Rathman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I can't say that I see any particular point to the essay.
>
> You must be new here. There never is any particular point to Xah
> Lee's rantings except to cross-post borderline topics to borderline
> relevant NGs and then lay back
Chris Rathman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I can't say that I see any particular point to the essay.
You must be new here. There never is any particular point to Xah Lee's
rantings except to cross-post borderline topics to borderline relevant
NGs and then lay back and enjoy the ensuing slaughter.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a proliferation of computer languages today like never
before.
"... today ... 1,700 special programming languages used to
'communicate' in over 700 application areas." -- Computer Software
Issues, an American Mathematical Association P
I can't say that I see any particular point to the essay. But I did
want to point out that Oz should not be considered part of the ML
family. Aside from not being statically typed - a very central tenet
to ML, Oz is much more part of the Logic family of languages (Mercury,
Prolog, etc...).
On Ju
Today, i took sometime to list some major or talked-about langs that
arose in recent years.
Here's the result:
http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/writ/new_langs.html
Plain text version follows.
-
There is a proliferation of computer languages today like
10 matches
Mail list logo
