Kenneth McDonald wrote:
> Subject: pre-PEP: Object-oriented file module
Please have a look at
http://topjaklont.student.utwente.nl/creaties/path/pep-.html
if you haven't done so already.
Gerrit.
--
Temperature in Luleå, Norrbotten, Sweden:
| Current temperature 05-08-27 22:20:0
Kenneth McDonald wrote:
> Why would any of the issues below be any more difficult than they are with
> the current file functions? I'm not proposing a C replacement for current
> functions, merely a Python module that wraps all of those functions (and
> adds some additional ones) in an appropriate
Why would any of the issues below be any more difficult than they are withthe current file functions? I'm not proposing a C replacement for currentfunctions, merely a Python module that wraps all of those functions (andadds some additional ones) in an appropriate class.On Aug 25, 2005, at 5:28 PM,
Kenneth McDonald wrote:
> I'd like to propose a new PEP [no, that isn't a redundant 'process' in
> there :-)--pre-PEP is a different process than PEP], for a standard
> library module that deals with files and file paths in an object
> oriented manner. I believe this module should be included as
I'd like to propose a new PEP [no, that isn't a redundant 'process'
in there :-)--pre-PEP is a different process than PEP], for a
standard library module that deals with files and file paths in an
object oriented manner. I believe this module should be included as
part of the standard Pytho