In comp.lang.perl.misc [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In February, i spent few hours researching the popularity of some
> computer language websites.
One way to do such research is for you to publish the actual number of
hits on your website. It's also easy to analyze logfile data
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alexa's data is more reliable than quantcast.
Alexa claim to have accurate data on lots of sites but I just tried to
correlate their data with the exact data on our web server and the
discrepancies are huge. For example, combining our number of absolute
visitors with the
I have updated the computing sites popularity ranking, based on both
alexa.com and quantcast.com.
The whole report nicely formatted in HTML is here:
http://xahlee.org/lang_traf/lang_sites.html
The following is a summary of some highlights.
the relative popularity of the following sites is rough
Op Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:07:31 +, schreef Roedy Green:
> The weakness of this approach is it is unusual group of people who will
> voluntarily submit to having their usage spied on. These are not a
> typical group or a large group.
Hello, planet Earth calling?
I guess around 90% of internet u
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:41:33 -0700 (PDT), "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said
:
> alexa
I was shocked at the detailed information Alexa (owned by Amzon.com)_
had about my website. I wrote them and asked how they got it. They
said volunteers
Gerry Ford wrote:
"Paul McGuire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 22, 4:41 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In February, i spent few hours researching the popularity of some
computer language websites.
I seem to recall this exact same post f
"Paul McGuire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 22, 4:41 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In February, i spent few hours researching the popularity of some
> computer language websites.
>
I seem to recall this exact same post from *last* Febru
On Apr 22, 4:41 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In February, i spent few hours researching the popularity of some
> computer language websites.
>
I seem to recall this exact same post from *last* February.
> I'll be doing some research sometimes soon on this.
>
... and no "res
Some entity, AKA "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote this
mindboggling stuff:
(selectively-snipped)
> My website is now actually ranked higher than PaulGraham.com !
well well, so your site is more popular.
You can make it even more popular, you know.
Just rename some lame article about
In February, i spent few hours researching the popularity of some
computer language websites.
(The message can be found here:
http://xahlee.org/lang_traf/lang_sites.html
http://community.livejournal.com/lisp/42778.html
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.perl.misc/msg/59c87899c2668f4c
)
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Questions:
>
> • paulgraham.com is unusually high. What's up with that?
He writes well. Also, if you look at the ranking, end of januari (Arc's
first release) was the highest ranking in 4 months. I'm surprised it
didn't score higher, actually.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Many top ones are due to the popularity of the lang, but also because
> their site hosts the lang's documentation and discussion forum (or
> wiki,blogs). Hosting a web forum are likely to increase traffic some
> 10 or 100 fold.
I think this goes to show that you can't re
12 matches
Mail list logo
