On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:57:31 -0600, Paul Lemelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jorgen,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> The ssh function is just a small part of what I would like to
> accomplish. And yes, chk is undefined, I was trying to figure out why
> control was not being returned from the sshc
Jorgen,
Thanks for your reply.
The ssh function is just a small part of what I would like to
accomplish. And yes, chk is undefined, I was trying to figure out why
control was not being returned from the sshcon funciton.
I looked for pexpect doucment on http://www.noah.org/wiki/Pexpect, but
th
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:12:36 -0700 (PDT), Paul Lemelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am trying separate a script that users pexpect into
> various functions within the same expect session. The
> problem is that the function does not return control
> back Main.
I do not understand what that sent
I am trying separate a script that users pexpect into
various functions within the same expect session. The
problem is that the function does not return control
back Main. Any insight into this issue would be
greatly appreciated. Below is sample code of the
problem.
Thanks,
Paul
impor
Hi,
While I continue to look at the problem, I thought I would post more
details. In a sense, this is more of a UNIX issue.
I have a python script that uses pexpect to spawn a child process (p1).
The python script then goes ahead and does a "tail --pid=p1". Assuming
that I do close(wait=0), P1 c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Currently, I am spawning a new thread
> that just does pexpect_spawned_child.close(wait=1). It seems to work in
> some cases but the child process is occassionally getting deadlocked.
I think your only cross-platform option will be to fix the child
process to die nicely
Hi,
I actually replied saying that the process dies when close(wait=0) is
done (the reply doesn't show up yet). It is not correct. The process
actually runs but ends up in zombie status (defunct).
Raghu.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" == [EMAIL PROTECTED] com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> I am using pexpect to spawn an interactive program and wait for
> particular string in its output. It works fine but once I get this
> required information, I really don't care about the child process
> anymore.
Hi,
I am using pexpect to spawn an interactive program and wait for
particular string in its output. It works fine but once I get this
required information, I really don't care about the child process
anymore. I would effectively want to "detach" from it. Is there any way
to do such thing in pexpe
