Peter Hansen wrote:
> Okay, granted. I guess this is the same as in any other case of
> deprecation (e.g. some people still have to work with code that uses
> apply() or string module methods).
Yup, this is exactly what will have to happen. Most or all of os.path
and maybe some of os/glob/fnmatc
Neil Hodgson wrote:
>>> There is a cost to the change as there will be two libraries that
>>> have to be known to understand code.
...
>At that point I was thinking about os.path and path.py. Readers will
> encounter code that uses both of these libraries.
Okay, granted. I guess this is th
Peter Hansen:
>> There is a cost to the change as there will be two libraries that have
>> to be known to understand code.
>
> Could you please clarify? Which two do you mean?
At that point I was thinking about os.path and path.py. Readers will
encounter code that uses both of these libr
Neil Hodgson wrote:
>To me, most uses of path.py are small incremental improvements over
> os.path rather than being compelling. Do a number of small improvements
> add up to be large enough to make this change?
If the number of small improvements is large enough then, as with other
such
Peter Hansen:
> Compelling to whom? I wonder if it's even possible for Guido to find
> compelling anything which obsoletes much of os.path and shutil and
> friends (modules which Guido probably added first and has used the most
> and feels most comfortable with).
To me, most uses of path.
Neil Hodgson wrote:
> Chris:
>
>> What is the status of the path module/class PEP? Did somebody start
>> writing one, or did it die? I would really like to see something like
>> Jason Orendorff's path class make its way into the python standard
>> library.
&g
Hi Neil,
Neil Hodgson wrote:
[snip]
> There is no PEP yet but there is a wiki page.
> http://wiki.python.org/moin/PathClass
> Guido was unenthusiastic so a good step would be to produce some
> compelling examples.
I guess it depends on what is "compelling" :)
I've been trying to come up
Chris:
> What is the status of the path module/class PEP? Did somebody start
> writing one, or did it die? I would really like to see something like
> Jason Orendorff's path class make its way into the python standard
> library.
There is no PEP yet but there is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> [...]
> What is the status of the path module/class PEP? Did somebody start
> writing one, or did it die?
I didn't find one at the PEP index <http://python.org/peps/>, so I
assume that nobody wrote or submitted one.
> I would really lik
Hi there,
I haven't seen this topic pop up in a while, so I thought I'd raise it
again...
What is the status of the path module/class PEP? Did somebody start
writing one, or did it die? I would really like to see something like
Jason Orendorff's path class make its way into the
10 matches
Mail list logo
