I had good results with os.symlink on Solaris, see
http://docs.python.org/lib/os-file-dir.html
Dan M wrote:
> I'm a little bit confused. According to the sources I've looked at on the
> net,
> os.link('file1', 'file2')
> should make a hard link from file1 to file2. But what I'm finding is that
Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan M wrote:
> > I'm a little bit confused. According to the sources I've looked at on the
> > net,
> > os.link('file1', 'file2')
> > should make a hard link from file1 to file2. But what I'm finding is that
> > it's actually making a copy. Am I forgetti
Dan M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a little bit confused. According to the sources I've looked at on the
> net,
> os.link('file1', 'file2')
> should make a hard link from file1 to file2. But what I'm finding is that
> it's actually making a copy. Am I forgetting a step or something?
>
Dan M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm a little bit confused. According to the sources I've looked at on the
> net,
> os.link('file1', 'file2')
> should make a hard link from file1 to file2. But what I'm finding is that
> it's actually making a copy. Am I forgetting a step or something?
Are
Dan M wrote:
> I'm a little bit confused. According to the sources I've looked at on the
> net,
> os.link('file1', 'file2')
> should make a hard link from file1 to file2. But what I'm finding is that
> it's actually making a copy. Am I forgetting a step or something?
>
> Python 2.3.4 running on
I'm a little bit confused. According to the sources I've looked at on the
net,
os.link('file1', 'file2')
should make a hard link from file1 to file2. But what I'm finding is that
it's actually making a copy. Am I forgetting a step or something?
Python 2.3.4 running on CentOS 4.3
--
http://m