Magnus Lycka wrote:
> To name a few concrete examples, Zope typically bundles its
> own python in the installation, and can work with just one
> version and let other software on the same machine use another
> python of a different version.
Note that Zope 3 doesn't do this. The system Python is u
Robert Kern wrote:
> So he can make an informed decision about how far back he should
> maintain compatibility?
I wasn't asking you! ;)
Depending on what kind of software this is, who the potential
users are, how the software will be distributed etc, the
importance of being backward compatible va
Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> just for fun, i looked at the top linux distros at distrowatch and looked at
> what version of python the latest released version is shipping with out of the
> box:
>
> 1. ubuntu hoary - python 2.4.1
> 2. mandriva 2005 - python 2.4
> 3. suse 9.3 - python 2.4
3
Magnus Lycka wrote:
> Bryan wrote:
>
>>is there a rough estimate somewhere that shows currently how many python
>>1.5 vs 2.2 vs 2.3 vs 2.4 users there are? have a majority moved to 2.4?
>>or are they still using 2.3? etc...
>
> Why do you want to know that?
So he can make an informed decision
Bryan wrote:
> is there a rough estimate somewhere that shows currently how many python
> 1.5 vs 2.2 vs 2.3 vs 2.4 users there are? have a majority moved to 2.4?
> or are they still using 2.3? etc...
Why do you want to know that?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> * 2.3 was called Python-in-a-tie;
Nope, that's 2.2. See e.g.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2002/08/msg00025.html
Sadly, it seems the Python Business Forum has died, or at least
fallen into some kind of coma, so I don't know if that's an
issue.
In corporate i
RHEL isn't really "big" on Distrowatch because Distrowatch is geared
more towards users.
RHEL 4.1 is using Python 2.3.4 now, btw.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Bryan wrote:
> just for fun, i looked at the top linux distros at distrowatch and looked at
> what version of python the latest released version is shipping with out of
> the box:
>
> 1. ubuntu hoary - python 2.4.1
> 2. mandriva 2005 - python 2.4
> 3. suse 9.3 - python 2.4
> 4. fedora core 4 - py
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Bryan wrote:
>
>>is there a rough estimate somewhere that shows currently how many python 1.5
>>vs
>>2.2 vs 2.3 vs 2.4 users there are? have a majority moved to 2.4? or are they
>>still using 2.3? etc...
>
>
> Here are current PIL download statistics (last 10 days):
>
>
On 2005-09-26, Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there a rough estimate somewhere that shows currently how many python 1.5
> vs
> 2.2 vs 2.3 vs 2.4 users there are? have a majority moved to 2.4? or are they
> still using 2.3? etc...
My guess is most are still using 2.3. The last time I lo
Bryan wrote:
> is there a rough estimate somewhere that shows currently how many python
> 1.5 vs 2.2 vs 2.3 vs 2.4 users there are? have a majority moved to 2.4?
> or are they still using 2.3? etc...
>
> thanks,
> bryan
I'd bet the majority is still using 2.3:
* 2.3 has been around a very l
Bryan wrote:
> is there a rough estimate somewhere that shows currently how many python 1.5
> vs
> 2.2 vs 2.3 vs 2.4 users there are? have a majority moved to 2.4? or are they
> still using 2.3? etc...
Here are current PIL download statistics (last 10 days):
75.6% /downloads/PIL-1.1.5.win32
is there a rough estimate somewhere that shows currently how many python 1.5 vs
2.2 vs 2.3 vs 2.4 users there are? have a majority moved to 2.4? or are they
still using 2.3? etc...
thanks,
bryan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
13 matches
Mail list logo
