Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-28 Thread ian douglas
On 10/05/2012 12:37 PM, Prasad, Ramit wrote: I might be misunderstanding, but I think Etienne wants money in exchange for letting someone else take over. Not to stir up the hornet's nest any more, but it also sounds like now he wants money for people to license things as well: "The license fee

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-07 Thread Dwight Hutto
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Etienne Robillard wrote: > Dear list, > > Due to lack of energy and resources i'm really sad to announce the removal of > notmm from pypi and bitbucket. I deleted > also my account from bitbucket as it was not really useful for me. Not 1 response? notmm will con

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-07 Thread Michael Torrie
On 10/07/2012 09:42 PM, Jason Friedman wrote: >>> It was a _joke_ referring to Michael Torrie's email addressing the >>> 8 Dihedral bot _as if it was a person_. >> >> Well it would be useful to probe the bot's parameters... > > Five eights is a busy bot: > http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-07 Thread Jason Friedman
>> It was a _joke_ referring to Michael Torrie's email addressing the >> 8 Dihedral bot _as if it was a person_. > > Well it would be useful to probe the bot's parameters... Five eights is a busy bot: http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t806110-p8-ok-lets-start-real-programming-in-c-for-prob

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-07 Thread Michael Torrie
On 10/07/2012 08:08 PM, alex23 wrote: > On Oct 8, 11:45 am, Dwight Hutto wrote: >> What is failed, but a timeline in this scenario, if you found the >> answer in the end? > > It was a _joke_ referring to Michael Torrie's email addressing the > 8 Dihedral bot _as if it was a person_. Well it

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-07 Thread alex23
On Oct 8, 11:45 am, Dwight Hutto wrote: > What is failed, but a timeline in this scenario, if you found the > answer in the end? It was a _joke_ referring to Michael Torrie's email addressing the 8 Dihedral bot _as if it was a person_. > Failure becomes answer not given in interval required,

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-07 Thread Dwight Hutto
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:19 PM, alex23 wrote: > On Oct 6, 12:59 pm, Michael Torrie wrote: >> I suppose a person can fail a turing test... > > You did, yes :) > What is failed, but a timeline in this scenario, if you found the answer in the end? Failure becomes answer not given in interval requi

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-07 Thread alex23
On Oct 6, 12:59 pm, Michael Torrie wrote: > I suppose a person can fail a turing test... You did, yes :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-05 Thread Ramchandra Apte
On Saturday, 6 October 2012 08:29:02 UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote: > On 10/05/2012 07:43 PM, 8 Dihedral wrote: > > > I think it is OK to have some string attatched in those open source > > projects. > > > > What are you talking about? What "string?" > > > > > Nowadays the software i

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-05 Thread Michael Torrie
On 10/05/2012 07:43 PM, 8 Dihedral wrote: > I think it is OK to have some string attatched in those open source projects. What are you talking about? What "string?" > Nowadays the software industry is just like the perfume and prtinting > and the audio-video entaertainment industry. True

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-05 Thread 88888 Dihedral
Prasad, Ramit於 2012年10月6日星期六UTC+8上午4時06分31秒寫道: > Steven D'Aprano wrote: > > > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:22 PM > > > To: python-list@python.org > > > Subject: Re: notmm is dead! > > > > > > On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:10:46 -0400

RE: notmm is dead!

2012-10-05 Thread Prasad, Ramit
Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:22 PM > To: python-list@python.org > Subject: Re: notmm is dead! > > On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:10:46 -0400, Etienne Robillard wrote: > > > Dear list, > > > > Due to lack of energy and resources i&#x

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-05 Thread Etienne Robillard
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 09:29:39 -0600 Ian Kelly wrote: > On Oct 4, 2012 6:56 PM, "Etienne Robillard" wrote: > > > > You probably have a old tarball or something... > > Not unless you've replaced it since I made my post, as I had just > downloaded it to check the license. The 0.4.4 release is old,

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-05 Thread Ian Kelly
On Oct 4, 2012 6:56 PM, "Etienne Robillard" wrote: > > You probably have a old tarball or something... Not unless you've replaced it since I made my post, as I had just downloaded it to check the license. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-05 Thread Michael Torrie
On 10/05/2012 04:43 AM, Etienne Robillard wrote: > No. All past notmm licenses were and still ARE ISC licensed. The license fee > is simply because I'm shifting into commercial license for new releases, > including > the newer 0.4.5 version... Pypi was not the authority source for notmm and > nei

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-05 Thread Etienne Robillard
No. All past notmm licenses were and still ARE ISC licensed. The license fee is simply because I'm shifting into commercial license for new releases, including the newer 0.4.5 version... Pypi was not the authority source for notmm and neither anyone can claim the license was left blank, thats onc

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-05 Thread Ramchandra Apte
On Thursday, 4 October 2012 23:40:47 UTC+5:30, Etienne Robillard wrote: > Dear list, > > > > Due to lack of energy and resources i'm really sad to announce the removal of > notmm from pypi and bitbucket. I deleted > > also my account from bitbucket as it was not really useful for me. notmm wi

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-04 Thread Michael Torrie
On 10/04/2012 05:13 PM, Etienne Robillard wrote: > Thanks, but I tried all that and don't have much energy for continuing. If > you're > serious about open source then maybe you can forward the thread to > django-developers > and get some fundings to pay for a minimalistic fee to get the project

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-04 Thread Etienne Robillard
You probably have a old tarball or something... $ wget http://gthc.org/dist/notmm/notmm-0.4.4.tar.gz $ md5sum notmm-0.4.4.tar.gz dff1b2ec5373b5157cf79d57169a336e notmm-0.4.4.tar.gz Cheers, Etienne On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 18:46:18 -0600 Ian Kelly wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Steven D'A

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-04 Thread Ian Kelly
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > By the way, the latest version of notmm (0.4.4) has an empty licence > file. No licence means that everyone using it is unlicenced and therefore > infringing your copyright. It's an ISC license. The notmm-0.4.4/LICENSE file is a link to th

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-04 Thread Etienne Robillard
Err not exactly.. :) Firstly notmm is still ISC licensed and available from here http://gthc.org/notmm/dist/. Secondly i don't want to leave it to the hands of people without I can get a single dime for the work did, however some peoples don't seem to get this point yet.. My apologies if you f

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-04 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Etienne Robillard wrote: > Thanks, but I tried all that and don't have much energy for continuing. If > you're > serious about open source then maybe you can forward the thread to > django-developers > and get some fundings to pay for a minimalistic fee to get the

Re: notmm is dead!

2012-10-04 Thread Etienne Robillard
Thanks, but I tried all that and don't have much energy for continuing. If you're serious about open source then maybe you can forward the thread to django-developers and get some fundings to pay for a minimalistic fee to get the project maintained by someone else, otherwise I'd prefer sticking

notmm is dead!

2012-10-04 Thread Etienne Robillard
Dear list, Due to lack of energy and resources i'm really sad to announce the removal of notmm from pypi and bitbucket. I deleted also my account from bitbucket as it was not really useful for me. notmm will continue to be accessible from my master site at http://gthc.org/dist/notmm until the se