Re: non-standard glibc location

2022-09-29 Thread Sandi Cimerman
On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 3:16:12 AM UTC+2, Fetchinson . wrote: > On 9/7/17, Thomas Jollans wrote: > > On 2017-09-06 16:14, Fetchinson . via Python-list wrote: > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> I'm trying to install a binary package (tensorflow) which contains > >> some binary C extensions. Now

Re: non-standard glibc location

2017-09-07 Thread Fetchinson . via Python-list
On 9/7/17, Thomas Jollans wrote: > On 2017-09-06 16:14, Fetchinson . via Python-list wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I'm trying to install a binary package (tensorflow) which contains >> some binary C extensions. Now my system glibc is 2.15 but the binaries >> in the C extensions were created (apparentl

Re: non-standard glibc location

2017-09-07 Thread Thomas Jollans
On 2017-09-06 16:14, Fetchinson . via Python-list wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm trying to install a binary package (tensorflow) which contains > some binary C extensions. Now my system glibc is 2.15 but the binaries > in the C extensions were created (apparently) with glibc 2.17. So I > thought no pr

Re: non-standard glibc location

2017-09-07 Thread dieter
"Fetchinson . via Python-list" writes: > I'm trying to install a binary package (tensorflow) which contains > some binary C extensions. Now my system glibc is 2.15 but the binaries > in the C extensions were created (apparently) with glibc 2.17. So I > thought no problemo I installed glibc 2.17 t

non-standard glibc location

2017-09-06 Thread Fetchinson . via Python-list
Hi folks, I'm trying to install a binary package (tensorflow) which contains some binary C extensions. Now my system glibc is 2.15 but the binaries in the C extensions were created (apparently) with glibc 2.17. So I thought no problemo I installed glibc 2.17 to a custom location, built python2.7 f