On 3/3/2016 8:39 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I don't think there has ever been a version of Python that ran on DOS :-)
Yep. That is what I started with (1.3). It ran fine with 2 megabytes
of memory and a 10 or 20 MB disk. No unicode module, database, or
codecs. Perhaps no tcl/tk/tkinter.
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:45 pm, crankypuss wrote:
>
>> Ben Finney wrote:
>>
>>> crankypuss writes:
>>>
"Python code can be packaged into stand-alone executable programs
for some of the most popular operating systems, allowing the
distribution of Python-base
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:45 pm, crankypuss wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
>
>> crankypuss writes:
>>
>>> "Python code can be packaged into stand-alone executable programs for
>>> some of the most popular operating systems, allowing the distribution
>>> of Python-based software for use on those environ
Ben Finney wrote:
> crankypuss writes:
>
>> "Python code can be packaged into stand-alone executable programs for
>> some of the most popular operating systems, allowing the distribution
>> of Python-based software for use on those environments without
>> requiring the installation of a Python i
crankypuss writes:
> "Python code can be packaged into stand-alone executable programs for
> some of the most popular operating systems, allowing the distribution of
> Python-based software for use on those environments without requiring
> the installation of a Python interpreter." (wikipedia)
"Python code can be packaged into stand-alone executable programs for
some of the most popular operating systems, allowing the distribution of
Python-based software for use on those environments without requiring
the installation of a Python interpreter." (wikipedia)
How correct is that? Which
