Steve Holden wrote:
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
[...]
I will be *very* surprised if you can't get a much better (i.e.
easier and more efficient) solution by stepping back from the
programming
Hmm, I'm not convinced, but I'll put few more words here then. ;)
details for a moment an
>
> Am I so deperately fighting the language? No-one here on the list needs to
> set hundreds
> variables at once somewhere in their code? I still don't get why:
>
I once (and only once) needed hundreds of variables in a program. It
was to simplify creation of unit tests, not for production us
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
[...]
I will be *very* surprised if you can't get a much better (i.e. easier
and more efficient) solution by stepping back from the programming
Hmm, I'm not convinced, but I'll put few more words here then. ;)
details for a moment and explaining what it
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
I need to test almost every for it's content. Some tests
are just that the value is non-empty (few cases), but in most cases
a lot more checks (only certain values allowed, or only int type allowed,
or only \w is allowed ...).
This sounds very much like an opportunity for some
Steve Holden wrote:
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Peter Hansen wrote:
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Am I so deperately fighting the language? No-one here on the list
needs to set hundreds variables at once somewhere in their code?
Nobody needs to do that. As others have pointed out, creating variables
implies
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Peter Hansen wrote:
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Am I so deperately fighting the language? No-one here on the list
needs to set hundreds variables at once somewhere in their code?
Nobody needs to do that. As others have pointed out, creating variables
implies wanting to access th
Peter Hansen wrote:
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Am I so deperately fighting the language? No-one here on the list
needs to set hundreds variables at once somewhere in their code?
Nobody needs to do that. As others have pointed out, creating variables
implies wanting to access them distinctly, not as
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Am I so deperately fighting the language? No-one here on the list needs
to set hundreds variables at once somewhere in their code?
Nobody needs to do that. As others have pointed out, creating variables
implies wanting to access them distinctly, not as a whole group. If
yo
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
The data passed to an instance come from sql tables. I have the idea
every table will be represented by an object.
Have you looked at SQLObject? I've never used it, but it does seem like
this is the sort of thing it was designed for:
http://sqlobject.org/
STeVe
--
http://ma
Hi to everyone who has repsonded. I'll try to clarify my problem in more detail.
I believe I have the answers how to assign to self. in superclasses. In case
you would know of yet another way, let me know. ;)
Steve Holden wrote:
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
See my post on Mar 2 abo
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
See my post on Mar 2 about "automating assignment of class variables".
I got no answers, maybe I wasn't clear enough ... :(
Seems so - I for example didn't understand it.
I need to define lots of variables. The variable names are often
identical. The
Martin MOKREJ wrote:
> Am I so deperately fighting the language? No-one here on the list
> needs to set hundreds variables at once somewhere in their code? I
> still don't get why:
I've certainly never needed to set hundreds of variables at once in my
code. I might have hundreds of values, but
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
See my post on Mar 2 about "automating assignment of class variables".
I got no answers, maybe I wasn't clear enough ... :(
Seems so - I for example didn't understand it.
I need to define lots of variables. The variable names are often
identical. The problem is that if I p
Kent Johnson wrote:
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for some easy way to do something like include in c or PHP.
Imagine I would like to have:
cat somefile.py
a = 222
b = 111
c = 9
cat somefile2.py
self.xxx = a
self.zzz = b
self.c = c
self.d = d
cat anotherfile.py
def a():
include somefile
> See my post on Mar 2 about "automating assignment of class variables".
> I got no answers, maybe I wasn't clear enough ... :(
Seems so - I for example didn't understand it.
>
> I need to define lots of variables. The variable names are often
> identical. The problem is that if I put such a cod
Scott David Daniels wrote:
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for some easy way to do something like include in c or PHP.
Imagine I would like to have:
I know about module imports and reloads, but am not sure if this is
the right way to go. Mainly, I want to assign to multiple object
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for some easy way to do something like include in c or PHP.
Imagine I would like to have:
cat somefile.py
a = 222
b = 111
c = 9
cat somefile2.py
self.xxx = a
self.zzz = b
self.c = c
self.d = d
cat anotherfile.py
def a():
include somefile
postprocess(a)
d
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for some easy way to do something like include in c or PHP.
Imagine I would like to have:
I know about module imports and reloads, but am not sure if this is the
right way to go. Mainly, I want to assign to multiple object instances
some self bound v
18 matches
Mail list logo
