On Jan 6, 11:36 am, Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:31:13 -0800, Soviut wrote:
> > I figured that an append would be treated as a set since I'm adding to
> > the list. But what you say makes sense, although I can't say I'm happy
> > with the behaviour. Is there any
On Jan 6, 11:36 am, Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:31:13 -0800, Soviut wrote:
> > I figured that an append would be treated as a set since I'm adding to
> > the list. But what you say makes sense, although I can't say I'm happy
> > with the behaviour. Is there any
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:31:13 -0800, Soviut wrote:
> I figured that an append would be treated as a set since I'm adding to
> the list. But what you say makes sense, although I can't say I'm happy
> with the behaviour. Is there any way I can get the append to fire a
> set? I'm thinking of propert
Soviut schrieb:
> On Jan 6, 3:03 am, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I've created a class that has a property which points at a private
>>> list. When I try to use the append() function on this list property,
>>> the fget method is fired rather than the fse
On Jan 6, 3:03 am, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I've created a class that has a property which points at a private
> > list. When I try to use the append() function on this list property,
> > the fget method is fired rather than the fset method. If I dir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've created a class that has a property which points at a private
> list. When I try to use the append() function on this list property,
> the fget method is fired rather than the fset method. If I directly
> set my property to a literal list, the set method fires.
>
I've created a class that has a property which points at a private
list. When I try to use the append() function on this list property,
the fget method is fired rather than the fset method. If I directly
set my property to a literal list, the set method fires.
Here's a stripped down version of m
