Dale King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Tim Roberts wrote:
>> "Xah Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Languages with Full Unicode Support
>>>
>>> As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
>>&g
Tim Roberts wrote:
> "Xah Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Languages with Full Unicode Support
>>
>> As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
>> unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unic
Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
> [...]
> (coerce (lschar :name "LATIN") 'string)
> --> "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
> ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏÐÑÒÓÔÕÖØÙÚÛÜÝÞßàáâãäåæçèéêëìíîïðñòóô
> [...]
In what programming language/interpreter is this code?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/li
Joachim Durchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oliver Bandel schrieb:
>> Matthias Blume wrote:
>>
>>> Tin Gherdanarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>
Oliver Bandel wrote:
> こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful
with such things in r
Oliver Bandel schrieb:
> Matthias Blume wrote:
>
>> Tin Gherdanarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>> Oliver Bandel wrote:
>>>
こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
>>>
>>> Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful
>>> with such things in real life; Koreans might
>>> beat you up for this. Stay alive
Oliver Bandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>Oliver Bandel wrote:
>>>
こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
>>>
>>>Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful
>>>with such things in real life; Koreans might
>>>beat you up for this. Stay alive!
>> And the Japanese might beat him up, too. For butchering the
Matthias Blume wrote:
> Tin Gherdanarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Oliver Bandel wrote:
>>
>>>こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
>>
>>Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful
>>with such things in real life; Koreans might
>>beat you up for this. Stay alive!
>
>
> And the Japanese might beat hi
Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> Chris Uppal schrieb:
>> Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>>
This is implementation-defined in C. A compiler is allowed to accept
variable names with alphabetic Unicode characters outside of ASCII.
>>>
>>> Hmm... that could would be nonportable, so C support for Unicode
Chris Uppal schreef:
> Since the interpretation of characters which are yet to be added to
> Unicode is undefined (will they be digits, "letters", operators,
> symbol, punctuation ?), there doesn't seem to be any sane way
> that a language could allow an unrestricted choice of Unicode in
> ide
Chris Uppal schrieb:
> Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>
>>> This is implementation-defined in C. A compiler is allowed to accept
>>> variable names with alphabetic Unicode characters outside of ASCII.
>> Hmm... that could would be nonportable, so C support for Unicode is
>> half-baked at best.
>
> Sin
Note Followup-To: comp.lang.java.programmer
Chris Uppal wrote:
> Since the interpretation of characters which are yet to be added to
> Unicode is undefined (will they be digits, "letters", operators, symbol,
> punctuation ?), there doesn't seem to be any sane way that a language
> could
> all
Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> > This is implementation-defined in C. A compiler is allowed to accept
> > variable names with alphabetic Unicode characters outside of ASCII.
>
> Hmm... that could would be nonportable, so C support for Unicode is
> half-baked at best.
Since the interpretation of char
Tim Roberts wrote:
> "Xah Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Languages with Full Unicode Support
>>
>>As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
>>unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
&g
Tim Roberts schrieb:
> "Xah Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> C ? No.
>
> This is implementation-defined in C. A compiler is allowed to accept
> variable names with alphabetic Unicode characters outside of ASCII.
Hmm... that could would be nonportable, so C support for Unicode is
half-baked at
"Xah Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Languages with Full Unicode Support
>
>As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
>unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
>(the JavaScript engine used by FireFox su
Tin Gherdanarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oliver Bandel wrote:
>> こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
>
> Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful
> with such things in real life; Koreans might
> beat you up for this. Stay alive!
And the Japanese might beat him up, too. For butchering their
language
Oliver Bandel wrote:
>
> こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful
with such things in real life; Koreans might
beat you up for this. Stay alive!
>
>
> Xah Lee wrote:
>
>> Languages with Full Unicode Support
>>
>>
"Oliver Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Xah Lee wrote:
>
>>
>> As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
>> unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
>
> Can you explain what you mena with the name
> As far as i know, here's few other lang's status:
>
> C → No.
I think C has the wchar type to handle larger values. And C++ has
std::wstring. So really, the support is there.
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html#c
I think the problem is that most C/C++ coders don't care about unicode
su
こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
Xah Lee wrote:
> Languages with Full Unicode Support
>
> As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
> unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
Can you explain what you mena with the names he
Xah Lee wrote:
> If you know a lang that does full unicode support, please let me know.
Tcl. You may have to modify the "source" command to get it to default
to something other than the system encoding, but this is trivial in Tcl.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Native America
Xah Lee wrote:
> Languages with Full Unicode Support
>
> As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
> unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
> (the JavaScript engine used by FireFox support this)
>
> As far as i k
Xah Lee wrote:
> Lisps → No.
The Common Lisp spec (CLHS) doesn't require that implementations support
Unicode characters, but it doesn't forbid it and some implementations
support it, e.g. http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes.html
--
Frank Buss, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.frank-buss.de, http://www.
Languages with Full Unicode Support
As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
(the JavaScript engine used by FireFox support this)
As far as i know, here's few other lang's statu
24 matches
Mail list logo
