In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve
Holden wrote:
> Though I do think it's an inappropriate choice for Python.
I'd characterize it as a Javaism. It exemplifies the difference between the
corporate, management-driven Java development model, versus the more
freewheeling, informal Python one. Like
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Abhishek Mishra wrote:
> I have the habit of using domain names (of either the application or
> company) in reverse in package names.
>
> for e.g. com.spam.app1
>
> I've recently started a project for an indian domain (tld = .in),
> which leads to a package name l
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
`com_spam.app1`!? I would even recommend this with domains that don't
clash with keywords because if several people start to use this package
name convention you will get name clashes at package level. Say there
are two vendors with a `com` TLD, how do you inst
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:05:38 -0700, Abhishek Mishra wrote:
>
>> I have the habit of using domain names (of either the application or
>> company) in reverse in package names.
[...]
> The `__init__.py` of which vendor
> should live at the `com/` directory level? If
Abhishek Mishra wrote:
> On Oct 19, 12:11 pm, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Abhishek Mishra wrote:
>>> Hello Everyone,
>>> I have the habit of using domain names (of either the application or
>>> company) in reverse in package names.
>>> for e.g. com.spam.app1
>> While this seemed a
On Oct 19, 7:05 am, Abhishek Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I have the habit of using domain names (of either the application or
> company) in reverse in package names.
>
> for e.g. com.spam.app1
>
> I've recently started a project for an indian domain (tld = .in),
> which
Abhishek Mishra schrieb:
On Oct 19, 2:06 pm, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
`com_spam.app1`!? I would even recommend this with domains that don't
clash with keywords because if several people start to use this package
name convention you will get name clashes at package lev
On Oct 19, 2:06 pm, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> `com_spam.app1`!? I would even recommend this with domains that don't
> clash with keywords because if several people start to use this package
> name convention you will get name clashes at package level. Say there
> are
Abhishek Mishra wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I have the habit of using domain names (of either the application or
company) in reverse in package names.
for e.g. com.spam.app1
I've recently started a project for an indian domain (tld = .in),
which leads to a package name like
in.spam.app1
This caus
On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:05:38 -0700, Abhishek Mishra wrote:
> I have the habit of using domain names (of either the application or
> company) in reverse in package names.
>
> for e.g. com.spam.app1
>
> I've recently started a project for an indian domain (tld = .in), which
> leads to a package na
On Oct 19, 12:11 pm, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Abhishek Mishra wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
>
> > I have the habit of using domain names (of either the application or
> > company) in reverse in package names.
>
> > for e.g. com.spam.app1
>
> While this seemed a good idea for java,
Abhishek Mishra wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I have the habit of using domain names (of either the application or
company) in reverse in package names.
for e.g. com.spam.app1
While this seemed a good idea for java, I don't think it makes
sense for python - the reason: in python you have an import
m
Hello Everyone,
I have the habit of using domain names (of either the application or
company) in reverse in package names.
for e.g. com.spam.app1
I've recently started a project for an indian domain (tld = .in),
which leads to a package name like
in.spam.app1
This causes a syntax error, as "in
13 matches
Mail list logo
