To: Albert-Jan Roskam
On Saturday, December 6, 2014 3:30:56 PM UTC-5, Albert-Jan Roskam wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 8:54 PM CET Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> >For those who haven't heard thought this might be of interest
https://github.com/fijal/jitpy
>
> Interesting,
To: python-list
On 7 December 2014 at 14:31, Albert-Jan Roskam
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 11:06 AM CET Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>
>>I think this is trying to position PyPy more in the same corner as other
>>JIT compilers for CPython, as opposed to keeping it a completely separate
>>thing which su
On Saturday, December 6, 2014 3:30:56 PM UTC-5, Albert-Jan Roskam wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 8:54 PM CET Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> >For those who haven't heard thought this might be of interest
> >https://github.com/fijal/jitpy
>
> Interesting, but it is not clear
On 7 December 2014 at 14:31, Albert-Jan Roskam
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 11:06 AM CET Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>
>>I think this is trying to position PyPy more in the same corner as other
>>JIT compilers for CPython, as opposed to keeping it a completely separate
>>thing which suffers from being "
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 11:06 AM CET Stefan Behnel wrote:
>Albert-Jan Roskam schrieb am 06.12.2014 um 21:28:
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 8:54 PM CET Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> For those who haven't heard thought this might be of interest
>> https://github.com/fijal/jitpy
>>
>> I
Albert-Jan Roskam schrieb am 06.12.2014 um 21:28:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 8:54 PM CET Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> For those who haven't heard thought this might be of interest
>> https://github.com/fijal/jitpy
>
> Interesting, but it is not clear to me when you would use jitpy instead
> of pypy.
I thin
Albert-Jan Roskam wrote:
> Interesting, but it is not clear to me when you would use jitpy instead
> of pypy. Too bad pypy alone was not included in the benchmarks (cython
> would have also been nice).
And Numba can JIT compile this far better than PyPy and jitpy.
Sturla
--
https://mail.pytho
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 8:54 PM CET Mark Lawrence wrote:
>For those who haven't heard thought this might be of interest
>https://github.com/fijal/jitpy
Interesting, but it is not clear to me when you would use jitpy instead of
pypy. Too bad pypy alone was not included
On 12/5/2014 2:54 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
For those who haven't heard thought this might be of interest
https://github.com/fijal/jitpy
So the old cpython module psyco which became the pypy jit is back as
jitpy. Nice.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-l
For those who haven't heard thought this might be of interest
https://github.com/fijal/jitpy
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
10 matches
Mail list logo