Josh Dukes wrote:
> $ python --version
> Python 2.5.2
>
> $ ruby --version
> ruby 1.8.6 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 287) [x86_64-linux]
>
> but I was more talking about the speed differences between ruby and python.
I heard that Ruby 1.9 is supposed to be a lot faster than 1.8 in many
aspects (as is
well if we're interested in that...
$ uname -a
Linux IT2-JD 2.6.27-gentoo-r8 #1 SMP Tue Mar 17 14:28:19 PDT 2009 x86_64
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
$ python --version
Python 2.5.2
$ ruby --version
ruby 1.8.6 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 287) [x86_64-linux]
but I was more
Josh Dukes wrote:
> $ time python -c 'a = "A";
> for r in xrange(10): a += "A" '
>
> real 0m0.109s
> user 0m0.100s
> sys 0m0.010s
>
> Anyone get different results?
Sure:
$ time python -c 'a = "A";
for r in xrange(10): a += "A" '
real0m0.140s
user0m0.132s
sys 0m0.008s
So The metasploit framework was suffering from some performance issues
which they fixed. http://www.metasploit.com/blog/
I was interested in comparing this to python. Language comparisons are
not generally very useful for a number of reasons, but some might find
this interesting.
Clearly the pyt
