[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> On Nov 5, 9:40 am, Paul McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On Nov 5, 11:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>suppose i want to
>>>make foo.childNodes[bar] available as foo[bar]
>>>(while still providing access to the printxml/printprettyxml()
>>>functions
>>>a
On Nov 5, 9:59 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Nov 5, 9:40 am, Paul McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 5, 11:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > suppose i want to
> > > make foo.childNodes[bar] available as foo[bar]
> > > (while still providing access to the printxml/printprettyx
On Nov 5, 9:40 am, Paul McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 11:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > suppose i want to
> > make foo.childNodes[bar] available as foo[bar]
> > (while still providing access to the printxml/printprettyxml()
> > functions
> > and other functionality of dom/mi
On Nov 5, 11:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> suppose i want to
> make foo.childNodes[bar] available as foo[bar]
> (while still providing access to the printxml/printprettyxml()
> functions
> and other functionality of dom/minidom instance).
>
> What is a good way to accomplish that?
define __get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> suppose i want to
> make foo.childNodes[bar] available as foo[bar]
> (while still providing access to the printxml/printprettyxml()
> functions
> and other functionality of dom/minidom instance).
>
> What is a good way to accomplish that?
Using element-tree. That alre
suppose i want to
make foo.childNodes[bar] available as foo[bar]
(while still providing access to the printxml/printprettyxml()
functions
and other functionality of dom/minidom instance).
What is a good way to accomplish that?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list