On Friday 24 September 2010, it occurred to Geoff Bache to exclaim:
> > > Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to do that in some cases. Consider the
> >
> > > following code:
> > It does behave as documented: it does not find package names, or
> > investigate sys.modules
>
> Possibly, although for me
> > Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to do that in some cases. Consider the
> > following code:
>
> It does behave as documented: it does not find package names, or investigate
> sys.modules
Possibly, although for me "logging" is exposed as a module, and ought
to behave as one when requesting the m
On Friday 24 September 2010, it occurred to Geoff Bache to exclaim:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to examine some things in my stack. The information I get
> out of inspect.stack() gives file names and I would like to convert
> them to module names. I naturally assumes inspect.getmodulename would
> fix
Hi all,
I'm trying to examine some things in my stack. The information I get
out of inspect.stack() gives file names and I would like to convert
them to module names. I naturally assumes inspect.getmodulename would
fix this for me.
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to do that in some cases. Consider
