"Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Holger Joukl
> wrote:
> > [a meaningless disclaimer text at the bottom of every message]
>
> Maybe you should rethink if it really makes sense to add this huge
> block of "nonsense" to a post to a newsgroup or public
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Holger Joukl
wrote:
> Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail ist vertraulich. Falls Sie nicht der angegebene
> Empfänger sind oder falls diese E-Mail irrtümlich an Sie adressiert wurde,
> verständigen Sie bitte den Absender sofort und löschen Sie die E-Mail
> sodann. Das unerlaubte Kopie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 13.12.2006
12:05:33:
> Holger Joukl wrote:
>
> >>> Ok, but I still don't see why these arguments shouldn't simply be
> >>> silently ignored
> >>
> >> >>> import this
> >
> > You probably refer to "Explicit is better than implicit.".
>
> "Errors should never pass sile
Holger Joukl wrote:
>>> Ok, but I still don't see why these arguments shouldn't simply be
>>> silently ignored
>>
>> >>> import this
>
> You probably refer to "Explicit is better than implicit.".
"Errors should never pass silently." is a better match, I think. you're
trying to do an invalid
Holger Joukl wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 13.12.2006
> 11:02:30:
>
> >
> > Holger Joukl wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > I consider the behaviour of unicode() inconvenient wrt to conversion of
> > > non-string
> > > arguments.
> > > While you can do:
> > >
> > > >>> unicode(17.3)
> > >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 13.12.2006
11:37:03:
> Holger Joukl wrote:
>
> > Ok, but I still don't see why these arguments shouldn't simply be
silently
> > ignored
>
> >>> import this
>
>
>
You probably refer to "Explicit is better than implicit.".
In that particular case I still think it woul
Holger Joukl wrote:
> Ok, but I still don't see why these arguments shouldn't simply be silently
> ignored
>>> import this
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 13.12.2006
11:02:30:
>
> Holger Joukl wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I consider the behaviour of unicode() inconvenient wrt to conversion of
> > non-string
> > arguments.
> > While you can do:
> >
> > >>> unicode(17.3)
> > u'17.3'
> >
> > you cannot do:
> >
> > >>> unico
Holger Joukl wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I consider the behaviour of unicode() inconvenient wrt to conversion of
> non-string
> arguments.
> While you can do:
>
> >>> unicode(17.3)
> u'17.3'
>
> you cannot do:
>
> >>> unicode(17.3, 'ISO-8859-1', 'replace')
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
Hi there,
I consider the behaviour of unicode() inconvenient wrt to conversion of
non-string
arguments.
While you can do:
>>> unicode(17.3)
u'17.3'
you cannot do:
>>> unicode(17.3, 'ISO-8859-1', 'replace')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
TypeError: coercing to Unicod
10 matches
Mail list logo
