On 19/07/2014 21:45, Terry Reedy wrote:
If you are talking about user processes, and we are talking about
patching Idle, as opposed to Python or the OS (such as Windows), I
disagree. If you are talking about the Idle process, then yes, I would
prefer that once Idle starts, it run forever, and re
On 20/07/2014 02:42, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
Does the IDLE bug-tracker exist to *SOLVE* problems or to
*PERPETUATE* them?
Definitely the latter. If it weren't for that tracker, bugs would just
quietly die on their own. The PSU has a roster f
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
> Does the IDLE bug-tracker exist to *SOLVE* problems or to
> *PERPETUATE* them?
Definitely the latter. If it weren't for that tracker, bugs would just
quietly die on their own. The PSU has a roster for feeding the bugs,
changing their litter,
On Saturday, July 19, 2014 3:45:07 PM UTC-5, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 7/19/2014 12:29 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
> [2.7.2 and 3.2.2] are ancient versions from years ago that
> no one should be running Idle on now.
I have just downloaded and installed versions 2.7.8 and
3.4.1, and i am happy to report
On 7/19/2014 12:29 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Friday, July 18, 2014 8:21:36 PM UTC-5, Terry Reedy wrote:
What ancient version, or oddball system are you using? For
me, Win 7, both 2.7.8 and 3.4.1 "CONTROL+LEFT_ARROW" and
the cursor is before the 'a' of [>>> abc]. The HOME key
goes to the same p
On 6/25/2010 1:24 PM, rantingrick wrote:
the "if __name__ == '__main__' tests" use
root.quit instead of root.destroy!
On Jun 25, 12:46 pm, Alan G Isaac wrote:
Did you open an issue?http://bugs.python.org/
On 6/25/2010 4:26 PM, rantingrick wrote:
If *I* open an issue it will be ignored
