> Note that once it has made the .pyc file the subsequent runs take even
> less memory than the cpickle import.
Could that be the compiler compiling?
Without knowing to much details about that process, but from 2.4 to
2.5 the compiler was totally exchanged, to AST.
That would explain the drop f
I've been dumping a database in a python code format (for use with
Python on S60 mobile phone actually) and I've noticed that it uses
absolutely tons of memory as compared to how much the data structure
actually needs once it is loaded in memory.
The programs below create a file (z.py) with a data
