In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ron_Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:09:37 -0500, Charles Hartman
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I know the answer to this is going to be "It depends . . .", but I want
>>to get my mind right. In Fowler's *Refactoring* I read: "Older
>>lang
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:09:37 -0500, Charles Hartman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I know the answer to this is going to be "It depends . . .", but I want
>to get my mind right. In Fowler's *Refactoring* I read: "Older
>languages carried an overhead in subroutine calls, which deterred
>people from
On Mar 29, 2005, at 10:36 AM, Peter Hansen wrote:
Sorry for the rant... I didn't intend it to head
that way when I started out, but I seem to be on a
bit of an anti-optimization bent today. :-)
No, that's very helpful; thanks.
Charles Hartman
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Charles Hartman wrote:
I know the answer to this is going to be "It depends . . .", but I want
to get my mind right. In Fowler's *Refactoring* I read: "Older languages
carried an overhead in subroutine calls, which deterred people from
small methods" (followed by the basic "Extract Method" advic
I know the answer to this is going to be "It depends . . .", but I want
to get my mind right. In Fowler's *Refactoring* I read: "Older
languages carried an overhead in subroutine calls, which deterred
people from small methods" (followed by the basic "Extract Method"
advice). In Skip Montanaro'
