On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 21:25, Stephen Tucker wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> Thanks for this clarification.
>
> I have not found documentation that disagrees with you. I simply observe that
> the documentation that I have alluded to earlier in this chain (section 5.9
> File Objects)
That's specifically t
Chris,
Thanks for this clarification.
I have not found documentation that disagrees with you. I simply observe
that the documentation that I have alluded to earlier in this chain
(section 5.9 File Objects) could have been made clearer by the addition of
a note along the lines that the behaviour o
Chris Angelico schreef op 11/01/2023 om 18:36:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 04:31, Stephen Tucker wrote:
> 1. Create BOM.txt
> 2. Input three bytes at once from BOM.txt and print them
> 3. Input three bytes one at a time from BOM.txt and print them
All of these correctly show that a file, in binary m
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 04:31, Stephen Tucker wrote:
> 1. Create BOM.txt
> 2. Input three bytes at once from BOM.txt and print them
> 3. Input three bytes one at a time from BOM.txt and print them
All of these correctly show that a file, in binary mode, reads and writes bytes.
> 4. Input three by
Chris,
Thanks for your reply.
I hope the evidence below (taken from IDLE) clarifies my issue:
Stephen.
==
1. Create BOM.txt
-
>>> myfil = open ("BOM.txt", "wb")
>>> myfil.write ("\xef" + "\xbb" + "\xbf")
>>> myfil.close()
2. Input three bytes at once from
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 21:31, Stephen Tucker wrote:
>
> Chris -
>
> In the Python 2.7.10 documentation, I am referring to section 5. Built-in
> Types, subsection 5.9 File Objects.
>
> In that subsection, I have the following paragraph:
>
> file.read([size])
>
> Read at most size bytes from the fi
Chris -
In the Python 2.7.10 documentation, I am referring to section 5. Built-in
Types, subsection 5.9 File Objects.
In that subsection, I have the following paragraph:
file.read([*size*])
Read at most *size* bytes from the file (less if the read hits EOF before
obtaining *size* bytes). If the
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 01:36, Stephen Tucker wrote:
>
> Dear Python-list,
>
> Yes, I know that Python 2.x is no longer supported.
>
> I have found that the documentation for this method is misleading when the
> file being read is UTF-8-encoded:
>
>Instead of reading *size* bytes, the method re
On 09/01/2023 14:34, Stephen Tucker wrote:
Dear Python-list,
Yes, I know that Python 2.x is no longer supported.
I have found that the documentation for this method is misleading when the
file being read is UTF-8-encoded:
Instead of reading *size* bytes, the method reads *size *UTF-8 byt
Dear Python-list,
Yes, I know that Python 2.x is no longer supported.
I have found that the documentation for this method is misleading when the
file being read is UTF-8-encoded:
Instead of reading *size* bytes, the method reads *size *UTF-8 byte
*sequences*.
Has this error been corrected in
10 matches
Mail list logo
