On Oct 14, 8:45 pm, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 14Oct2010 20:11, Steve Howell wrote:
> | Is there a way to extract code out of a generator function f() into
> | g() and be able to have f() yield g()'s result without this idiom?:
> |
> | for g_result in g():
> | yield g_result
> |
> | It fee
On 14Oct2010 20:11, Steve Howell wrote:
| Is there a way to extract code out of a generator function f() into
| g() and be able to have f() yield g()'s result without this idiom?:
|
| for g_result in g():
| yield g_result
|
| It feels like a clumsy hindrance to refactoring, to have to intr
Is there a way to extract code out of a generator function f() into
g() and be able to have f() yield g()'s result without this idiom?:
for g_result in g():
yield g_result
It feels like a clumsy hindrance to refactoring, to have to introduce
a local variable and a loop.
Here is a program t
