Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a way to ensure that GNU readline isn't used (even though
> support may have been compiled in?). I'm experiencing a licensing
> problem
Note that the GPL (the license terms of readline) is like any other
valid copyright license in that it only
Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to ensure that GNU readline isn't used (even though
>> support may have been compiled in?). I'm experiencing a licensing
>> problem, I'd like to use the "cmd" module, for example, but my code is
Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to ensure that GNU readline isn't used (even though
> support may have been compiled in?). I'm experiencing a licensing
> problem, I'd like to use the "cmd" module, for example, but my code is
> proprietary and hence, if cmd uses readline,
Is there a way to ensure that GNU readline isn't used (even though
support may have been compiled in?). I'm experiencing a licensing
problem, I'd like to use the "cmd" module, for example, but my code is
proprietary and hence, if cmd uses readline, I can't use cmd.
Unfortunately, I can't control i