samwyse wrote:
> On Jan 18, 1:56 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 1/17/2010 5:37 PM, samwyse wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Consider this a wish list. I know I'm unlikely to get any of these in
>>> time for for my birthday, but still I felt the need to toss it out and
>>> see what happens.
>>> Lately, I'v
samwyse, 18.01.2010 13:49:
> Curiously, no matter how I
> order my PATH, the wrong version seems to appear first more than half
> the time! I'm seriously considering renaming all my Python 3 code to
> use a .py3 file extension.
You should be able to start the interpreter as "python3.1" to be sure
On Jan 18, 6:20 am, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Note that the cmp() builtin and the cmp parameter for list.sort() are gone
> in Python 3.
I've got Python 3 installed, and am using it for most new
development. In this case case, however, I'm writing for the Google
App Engine, which is
samwyse wrote:
> On Jan 18, 3:06 am, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
>> samwyse wrote:
>> > Lately, I've slinging around a lot of lists, and there are some simple
>> > things I'd like to do that just aren't there.
>>
>> > s.count(x[, cmp[, key]])
>> > - return number of i‘s for which s[i] ==
On Jan 17, 11:30 pm, Asun Friere wrote:
> On Jan 18, 9:37 am, samwyse wrote:
>
> > Consider this a wish list. I know I'm unlikely to get any of these in
> > time for for my birthday, but still I felt the need to toss it out and
> > see what happens.
>
> > Lately, I've slinging around a lot of li
On Jan 18, 3:06 am, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> samwyse wrote:
> > Lately, I've slinging around a lot of lists, and there are some simple
> > things I'd like to do that just aren't there.
>
> > s.count(x[, cmp[, key]])
> > - return number of i‘s for which s[i] == x. 'cmp' specifies a c
On Jan 18, 1:56 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 1/17/2010 5:37 PM, samwyse wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Consider this a wish list. I know I'm unlikely to get any of these in
> > time for for my birthday, but still I felt the need to toss it out and
> > see what happens.
>
> > Lately, I've slinging around a l
samwyse wrote:
> Lately, I've slinging around a lot of lists, and there are some simple
> things I'd like to do that just aren't there.
>
> s.count(x[, cmp[, key]])
> - return number of i‘s for which s[i] == x. 'cmp' specifies a custom
> comparison function of two arguments, as in '.sort'. 'key
On 1/17/2010 5:37 PM, samwyse wrote:
Consider this a wish list. I know I'm unlikely to get any of these in
time for for my birthday, but still I felt the need to toss it out and
see what happens.
Lately, I've slinging around a lot of lists, and there are some simple
things I'd like to do that j
On Jan 18, 9:37 am, samwyse wrote:
> Consider this a wish list. I know I'm unlikely to get any of these in
> time for for my birthday, but still I felt the need to toss it out and
> see what happens.
>
> Lately, I've slinging around a lot of lists, and there are some simple
> things I'd like to d
Consider this a wish list. I know I'm unlikely to get any of these in
time for for my birthday, but still I felt the need to toss it out and
see what happens.
Lately, I've slinging around a lot of lists, and there are some simple
things I'd like to do that just aren't there.
s.count(x[, cmp[, ke
11 matches
Mail list logo
