Yingjie Lan wrote:
> Maybe somebody already suggested this:
>
> How about "{:}" for the empty dict,
> so that "{}" can denote the empty set?
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2007-April/006620.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 15/07/2010 13:30, Yingjie Lan wrote:
Hi there,
Maybe somebody already suggested this:
How about "{:}" for the empty dict,
so that "{}" can denote the empty set?
Well one thing is that {} has denoted the empty dict
for many many releases of Python so a *lot* of code
would break if you sudde
Hi there,
Maybe somebody already suggested this:
How about "{:}" for the empty dict,
so that "{}" can denote the empty set?
Yingjie
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list