On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> (I think... I really don't actually know if Zooey Deschanel can sing or
> not. Just go along with the example.)
Not only does she sing, she's in a band.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/She_%26_Him
I take your point about the "looks like" ter
...@live.com; python-list@python.org
> Subject: RE: duck typing assert
> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 17:37:29 +
>
> Andriy Kornatskyy wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for all comments.
> >
> > > It makes very good sense to say:
> > >
> > > duckmatch(IFoo
Andriy Kornatskyy wrote:
>
> Thank you for all comments.
>
> > It makes very good sense to say:
> >
> > duckmatch(IFoo).compare(Foo)
>
> Since we do duck match of IFoo... but there is no `duck match`, there is
> `duck test`. I believe instead of
> `compare` is more readable with `equals`. Than
Nov 2012 01:15:36 +1100
> Subject: Re: duck typing assert
> From: ros...@gmail.com
> To: python-list@python.org
>
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Andriy Kornatskyy
> wrote:
> >
> > 1. In looks-like we check features of Foo (that may be superset) of what
> > IFoo
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Andriy Kornatskyy
wrote:
>
> 1. In looks-like we check features of Foo (that may be superset) of what IFoo
> offers.
>
> assert looks(Foo).like(IFoo)
>
> 2. We can check if Foo is limited to IFoo only:
>
> assert looks(IFoo).like(Foo)
>
> So it valid to have both
> From: steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info
> Subject: Re: duck typing assert
> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 13:36:39 +
> To: python-list@python.org
>
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:00:58 -0700, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Steven D'Aprano
>
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:00:58 -0700, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:34:58 +0300, Andriy Kornatskyy wrote:
>>
>>> People who come from strongly typed languages that offer interfaces
>>> often are confused by lack of one in Pytho
Foo).like(IFoo)
assert looks(IFoo).like(Foo)
Thanks.
Andriy Kornatskyy
--------
> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 17:14:49 +1100
> Subject: Re: duck typing assert
> From: ros...@gmail.com
> To: python-list@python.org
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> looks(Foo).like(IFoo), on the other hand, is crystal clear about which
> argument is which.
I'm not so sure that it is, tbh. If you read it like an English
sentence, it's clearly testing whether Foo matches the template in
IFoo, but which are yo
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:34:58 +0300, Andriy Kornatskyy wrote:
>
>> People who come from strongly typed languages that offer interfaces
>> often are confused by lack of one in Python. Python, being dynamic
>> typing programming language, follo
.ke...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 11:34:45 -0700
> Subject: Re: duck typing assert
> To: python-list@python.org
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Andriy Kornatskyy
> wrote:
> >
> > People who come from strongly typed languages that offer interfaces often
>
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Andriy Kornatskyy
wrote:
>
> People who come from strongly typed languages that offer interfaces often are
> confused by lack of one in Python. Python, being dynamic typing programming
> language, follows duck typing principal. It can as simple as this:
>
> asser
People who come from strongly typed languages that offer interfaces often are
confused by lack of one in Python. Python, being dynamic typing programming
language, follows duck typing principal. It can as simple as this:
assert looks(Foo).like(IFoo)
The post below shows how programmer can asse
13 matches
Mail list logo
