On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:29:39 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Personally, I tend to use a combination of approaches. Since doctests
> aren't intended for full test coverage, I use *short* tests in methods.
> If I can't make a test short, it doesn't go into the method doctest. For
> more extensive t
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:16:50 -0700, mde wrote:
> I'm wondering if there is a "best practice" for *creating doctests in
> methods* that reduces clutter/duplication of dummy instantiations. In
> the following code there are five (labeled 1-5) possible places to put a
> dummy mock instantiation. I
I'm wondering if there is a "best practice" for *creating doctests in
methods* that reduces clutter/duplication of dummy instantiations. In
the following code there are five (labeled 1-5) possible places to put
a
dummy mock instantiation. I have the impression that creating the
dummies in every m
