On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:17 PM, bdb112 wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply - I expanded it to a working program,
> it seems to do the job and works in my actual code (always good). As
> you said, it assumes the called function's class is already defined.
> Is there a way around this? (The mo
Thanks for the quick reply - I expanded it to a working program,
it seems to do the job and works in my actual code (always good). As
you said, it assumes the called function's class is already defined.
Is there a way around this? (The module was originally ordered
"top-down").
class Cl
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:23 PM, bdb112 wrote:
> A function of the class ClusterSet uses a similar function of the
> class Cluster to do most of its work. Its docstring could have so
> much in common with that in Cluster that it could be just a line or
> two in addition to that of Cluster.
>
> Is
A function of the class ClusterSet uses a similar function of the
class Cluster to do most of its work. Its docstring could have so
much in common with that in Cluster that it could be just a line or
two in addition to that of Cluster.
Is there a way for the ClusterSet docstring to tack the Clust
