Rick Zantow>In any case, what would you want to do that you can't do
(in some way) now?<
You can do all things already, that's not the point, I presume. Some
things added in the last years were already possibile in different
ways.
Rick Zantow>If you have a compelling use case,<
I agree that suc
My usual way of emulating do-while is:
started = False
while (someBoolean or not started):
started = True
#whatever else
This simply assures "whatever else" happens at least once. Is this
Pythonic?
THN
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:41:04 +0200 in comp.lang.python, Marc
'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ? wrote:
>
>> suggest add do while loop in later version
>
>Please also suggest a clean syntax for this. :-)
>
whil
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, é· wrote:
>
>> suggest add do while loop in later version
>
> Please also suggest a clean syntax for this. :-)
>
Since Python already
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 雷 wrote:
> suggest add do while loop in later version
Please also suggest a clean syntax for this. :-)
Ciao,
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
suggest add do while loop in later version
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
