Daniel Franke, 14.01.2012 22:15:
> I spent some days and nights on this already and my google-fu is running out.
> I'd like to implement the equivalent of this Python code in a C-extension:
>
> >>> class A(object):
> pass
> >>> class B(A):
> pass
> >>> A
>
> >>> B
>
> >>> B.__bases__
Daniel Franke wrote:
>
>I'd like to implement the equivalent of this Python code in a C-extension:
>
class A(object):
>... pass
class B(A):
>... pass
A
>
B
>
B.__bases__
>(,)
>
>However, loading my C-code (quoted below) I get:
>
import ca
ca
>
ca.ca
>
>
>H
On Saturday 14 January 2012 22:15:36 Daniel Franke wrote:
> Here I'd expect "" instead?! And I never managed a proper
> subclass :|
Found an explanation on type/class at [1]: "he difference between the two is
whether the C-level type instance structure is flagged as having been
allocated on the
Hi all.
I spent some days and nights on this already and my google-fu is running out.
I'd like to implement the equivalent of this Python code in a C-extension:
>>> class A(object):
... pass
>>> class B(A):
... pass
>>> A
>>> B
>>> B.__bases__
(,)
However, loading my C-code (quoted below)
