Laszlo Nagy wrote:
>> I'm still thinking there is a better way to do it, and would
>> appreciate any ideas.
>
> Everything can be implemented with goto and arrays.
But is that really better?
Regards,
Björn
--
BOFH excuse #174:
Backbone adjustment
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/list
> I'm still thinking there is a better way to do it, and would appreciate
> any ideas.
>
Everything can be implemented with goto and arrays.
http://entrian.com/goto/
:-P
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> On 12 Jan 2007 06:17:01 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I'm happily using context managers and co-routines, and would like to
> >use both at the same time, e.g.
>
> Python has generators, not co-routines.
They may be called generators, but I'm using them as co-routi
On 12 Jan 2007 06:17:01 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'm happily using context managers and co-routines, and would like to
>use both at the same time, e.g.
Python has generators, not co-routines.
>
>with foo():
>...
>x = yield y
>...
>
>In this code multiple copies
