Re: chown'ing by script

D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:58:13 -0500 > Steve Holden wrote: >> Victor Subervi wrote: > [Usual nonsense removed] > >> Which, I don't doubt, could have been 2,000 lines had you bothered to > > Steve - any chance that you could stop replying to this idiot or at > least do it

Re: chown'ing by script

On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:58:13 -0500 Steve Holden wrote: > Victor Subervi wrote: [Usual nonsense removed] > Which, I don't doubt, could have been 2,000 lines had you bothered to Steve - any chance that you could stop replying to this idiot or at least do it privately. There's not much point to ki

Re: chown'ing by script

Victor Subervi wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:12 AM, alex23 > wrote: > > Carsten Haese > wrote: > > What is the underlying problem you're trying to solve with this > > approach? > > To be paid for developing a web

Re: chown'ing by script

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:12 AM, alex23 wrote: > Carsten Haese wrote: > > What is the underlying problem you're trying to solve with this > > approach? > > To be paid for developing a web site shopping cart without actually > having to learn Python. > LOL! I've written about 12,000 lines of code

Re: chown'ing by script

Carsten Haese wrote: > What is the underlying problem you're trying to solve with this > approach? To be paid for developing a web site shopping cart without actually having to learn Python. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: chown'ing by script

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Carsten Haese wrote: > Victor Subervi wrote: > > Hi; > > I have a script that is called via the web. This script writes another > > script that is also called by the web, which in turn needs to have > > execution privileges. The problem is that the programmatically

Re: chown'ing by script

Victor Subervi wrote: > Hi; > I have a script that is called via the web. This script writes another > script that is also called by the web, which in turn needs to have > execution privileges. The problem is that the programmatically created > file is owned by apache.apache and thus doesn't have e

Re: chown'ing by script

On 06Jan2010 01:21, Victor Subervi wrote: | I have a script that is called via the web. This script writes another | script that is also called by the web, which in turn needs to have execution | privileges. The problem is that the programmatically created file is owned | by apache.apache and thus

chown'ing by script

Hi; I have a script that is called via the web. This script writes another script that is also called by the web, which in turn needs to have execution privileges. The problem is that the programmatically created file is owned by apache.apache and thus doesn't have execution privileges. I've tried