Re: changing to function what works like a function

2011-03-07 Thread geremy condra
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:32 PM, alex23 wrote: > On Mar 8, 1:41 pm, alex23 wrote: >> Good to see you finally admit that you're not a programmer. Have you >> informed your clients yet? Or are you still learning Python on their >> dime and crowd-sourcing the more difficult parts? > > I'd like to apo

Re: changing to function what works like a function

2011-03-07 Thread alex23
On Mar 8, 1:41 pm, alex23 wrote: > Good to see you finally admit that you're not a programmer. Have you > informed your clients yet? Or are you still learning Python on their > dime and crowd-sourcing the more difficult parts? I'd like to apologise for this post. The OP is not the Victor I though

Re: changing to function what works like a function

2011-03-07 Thread alex23
Victor Paraschiv wrote: > What I conclude is that you, the programmers, don’t really care about > those who are new to programming: for most people out of the > programming world, I think it is simpler to be able to write: real(z), > just as you write: sin(z), abs(z), (z)^2 etc. Good to see you fi

Re: changing to function what works like a function

2011-03-07 Thread Terry Reedy
On 3/7/2011 1:12 PM, Victor Paraschiv wrote: Well, thank you all for being honest ☺ What I conclude is that you, the programmers, don’t really care about those who are new to programming: Whereas you exhibit your care for humanity by casually slandering those who offer you a gift. Grow up. Se

Re: changing to function what works like a function

2011-03-07 Thread Jean-Michel Pichavant
Victor Paraschiv wrote: Well, thank you all for being honest ☺ What I conclude is that you, the programmers, don’t really care about those who are new to programming: for most people out of the programming world, I think it is simpler to be able to write: real(z), just as you write: sin(z

Re: changing to function what works like a function

2011-03-07 Thread Victor Paraschiv
Well, thank you all for being honest ☺   What I conclude is that you, the programmers, don’t really care about those who are new to programming: for most people out of the programming world, I think it is simpler to be able to write: real(z), just as you write: sin(z), abs(z), (z)^2 etc.

Re: changing to function what works like a function

2011-03-07 Thread Benjamin Kaplan
On Mar 7, 2011 6:35 AM, "Victor Paraschiv" wrote: > > Hi everyone > i understood that the goal of Python is to make programing easy (of course, powerful at the same time). > I think one way to do it is to eliminate unnecessary syntax exceptions. One is the following: > for a complex number "z", to

Re: changing to function what works like a function

2011-03-07 Thread Westley Martínez
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 03:33 -0800, Victor Paraschiv wrote: > Hi everyone > i understood that the goal of Python is to make programing easy (of > course, powerful at the same time). > I think one way to do it is to eliminate unnecessary syntax > exceptions. One is the following: > for a complex numb

Re: changing to function what works like a function

2011-03-07 Thread Ian
On 07/03/2011 11:33, Victor Paraschiv wrote: Hi everyone i understood that the goal of Python is to make programing easy (of course, powerful at the same time). I think one way to do it is to eliminate unnecessary syntax exceptions. One is the following: for a complex number "z", to get the rea

changing to function what works like a function

2011-03-07 Thread Victor Paraschiv
Hi everyone i understood that the goal of Python is to make programing easy (of course, powerful at the same time). I think one way to do it is to eliminate unnecessary syntax exceptions. One is the following: for a complex number "z", to get the real and imaginary  part, you type:  "z.real" and