On 11 Nov., 23:59, Brendan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would heavy python unit testers say is the best framework?
>
> I've seen a few mentions that maybe the built in unittest framework
> isn't that great.
The UT frameworks follow the same principles and are all alike more or
less. Of
On 15 Nov, 01:02, "Brendan Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:54 AM, James Harris
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11 Nov, 22:59, Brendan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> What would heavy python unit testers say is the best framework?
>
> >> I've seen a fe
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:54 AM, James Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11 Nov, 22:59, Brendan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What would heavy python unit testers say is the best framework?
>>
>> I've seen a few mentions that maybe the built in unittest framework
>> isn't that great. I'
On 11 Nov, 22:59, Brendan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would heavy python unit testers say is the best framework?
>
> I've seen a few mentions that maybe the built in unittest framework
> isn't that great. I've heard a couple of good things about py.test and
> nose. Are there other opti
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Roy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Timothy Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I wanted to like unittest but couldn't. So I started using py.test. I
>> even wrote a plugin for TextMate to interface with py.test. If I had
>>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Timothy Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wanted to like unittest but couldn't. So I started using py.test. I
> even wrote a plugin for TextMate to interface with py.test. If I had
> known about Nose I would likely have used it instead because it is
> built on
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Brendan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would heavy python unit testers say is the best framework?
>
> I've seen a few mentions that maybe the built in unittest framework
> isn't that great. I've heard a couple of good things about py.test and
> nose. Are t
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Brendan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would heavy python unit testers say is the best framework?
>
> I've seen a few mentions that maybe the built in unittest framework
> isn't that great. I've heard a couple of good things about py.test and
> nose. Ar
Brendan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What would heavy python unit testers say is the best framework?
>
> I've seen a few mentions that maybe the built in unittest framework
> isn't that great. I've heard a couple of good things about py.test and
> nose. Are there other options? Is there an
Brendan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What would heavy python unit testers say is the best framework?
>
> I've seen a few mentions that maybe the built in unittest framework
> isn't that great.
That's right, there are many flaws in ‘unittest’. It nevertheless has
the overwhelming advantag
What would heavy python unit testers say is the best framework?
I've seen a few mentions that maybe the built in unittest framework
isn't that great. I've heard a couple of good things about py.test and
nose. Are there other options? Is there any kind of concensus about
the best, or at least how t
11 matches
Mail list logo